Related Experiment Videos
Unit price and choice in a token-reinforcement context
Theresa A Foster1, Timothy D Hackenberg
1University of Florida, Department of Psychology, Gainesville, Florida 32611-2250, USA. tafoster@ufl.edu
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
|April 29, 2004
Summary
Pigeons preferred lower token prices and smaller response ratios when choosing between food options. Preferences were mainly driven by the delay to receiving the food reinforcer.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral psychology
- Animal behavior
- Operant conditioning
Background:
- Understanding choice behavior is crucial in behavioral economics and psychology.
- Token reinforcement schedules help model complex decision-making processes in animals.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate pigeon preferences between concurrent second-order schedules of token reinforcement.
- To examine how unit price and ratio size influence choice behavior.
- To evaluate a unit-price model incorporating handling and reinforcer immediacy costs.
Main Methods:
- Pigeons were exposed to multiple and concurrent second-order schedules with stimulus lights as token reinforcers.
- Tokens were exchanged for food under fixed-ratio schedules with equal and unequal unit prices.
- Response rates and preference data were recorded under varying ratio sizes and unit prices.
Main Results:
- Pigeons showed a strong preference for lower unit prices when they were unequal.
- When unit prices were equal, preferences depended on ratio size, favoring smaller ratios.
- Response rates aligned with preference data, indicating sensitivity to ratio size and delay.
Conclusions:
- Choice behavior in pigeons is significantly influenced by the unit price of reinforcers.
- Delay to the exchange period (reinforcer immediacy) was a primary determinant of preference.
- A unit-price model, including additional costs, can effectively explain observed choice patterns.