Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Levels of processing effects on implicit and explicit memory tasks: using question position to investigate the

Ben R Newell1, Sally Andrews

  • 1Department of Psychology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK. b.newell@ucl.ac.uk

Experimental Psychology
|April 30, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Trapped by selective attention: The role of attentional processes in the emergence and prevention of learning traps.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2025
Same author

Examining the Relationship Between Early Experience, Selective Attention, and the Formation of Learning Traps.

Cognitive science·2025
Same author

A timeline of cognitive costs in decision-making.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2025
Same author

On-task errors drive effort avoidance more than opportunity costs.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2025
Same author

The impact of sampling bias on preferences for skewed distributions in decisions from experience.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Emerging adaptivity in probability learning: How young minds and the environment interact.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2025

Levels of processing (LOP) effects on memory priming may stem from shallow lexical processing. Manipulating encoding questions did not alter implicit memory priming, suggesting deeper lexical processing isn't the sole factor.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Memory Research

Background:

  • Levels of Processing (LOP) theory suggests deeper semantic encoding enhances memory recall.
  • Priming in implicit memory tests is often interpreted through the lens of lexical processing efficiency.
  • Shallow encoding tasks may limit lexical processing, impacting subsequent memory performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of lexical processing depth in Levels of Processing (LOP) effects on memory priming.
  • To determine if manipulating encoding depth influences priming in implicit memory tasks.
  • To clarify the relationship between study task characteristics and implicit memory performance.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments manipulated the timing of encoding questions relative to target stimuli (before vs. after).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Shallow encoding tasks were employed to assess effects on word processing depth.
  • Explicit memory tasks and implicit memory priming tasks were used to measure memory performance.

    • Main Results:

    • Explicit memory tasks showed increased processing depth when encoding questions followed the target stimulus.
    • Implicit memory priming tasks did not show significant effects of the encoding question timing.
    • The depth of lexical processing did not appear to modulate priming effects under these conditions.

    Conclusions:

    • The findings challenge the interpretation that deficits in lexical processing fully explain LOP effects on priming.
    • Further research is needed to precisely define the mechanisms linking lexical processing and LOP effects in implicit memory.
    • The study highlights a dissociation between explicit memory and implicit priming in response to encoding manipulations.