Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Time perception with and without a concurrent nontemporal task.

Nancy S Hemmes1, Bruce L Brown, Chris N Kladopoulos

  • 1Department of Psychology, Queens College, City University of New York, Flushing, New York 11367, USA. nancy_hemmes@qc.edu

Perception & Psychophysics
|May 8, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sex-Specific Electrocortical Interactions in a Color Recognition Task in Men and Women with Opioid Use Disorder.

Biomedicines·2025
Same author

Cohen-mansfield agitation inventory total score as a measure of agitation and aggression in Alzheimer's disease: A factor analysis.

International psychogeriatrics·2025
Same author

Hospital-Acquired Infection at Time of Stroke and Cognitive Decline: The Cardiovascular Health Study.

Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
Same author

Gender-Specific Interactions in a Visual Object Recognition Task in Persons with Opioid Use Disorder.

Biomedicines·2023
Same author

Cognitive function in UK adults seropositive for Helicobacter pylori.

PloS one·2023
Same author

Gap in the conditioned stimulus: Differential impacts on temporal expectancy in appetitive and aversive conditions in rats.

Behavioural processes·2022
Same journal

Response organization in selective adaptation to speech sounds.

Perception & psychophysics·2014
Same journal

Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Simple and contingent adaptation effects for place of articulation in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory property detectors and processing place features in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Visual working memory for line orientations and face identities.

Perception & psychophysics·2008
See all related articles

Concurrent tasks reduce perceived time duration, aligning with attention models. However, task conditions revealed power functions in timing, suggesting different sensory inputs influence time perception with and without tasks.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Perception

Background:

  • Attentional resource allocation models propose that cognitive load impacts time perception.
  • Previous research indicates concurrent tasks decrease perceived duration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how concurrent nontemporal tasks affect prospective time estimates.
  • To explore the influence of task location and psychophysical methods on time perception.
  • To test the perceptual hypothesis regarding sensory input mediation in timing.

Main Methods:

  • Human subjects provided prospective time estimates for stimuli ranging from 2 to 23 seconds.
  • A concurrent nontemporal task was manipulated (present/absent) within subjects across three experiments.
  • Task location and psychophysical methods were varied between groups in Experiments 2 and 3.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Concurrent tasks decreased perceived duration for long stimuli, consistent with attention theories.
  • Task location and psychophysical method effects supported attentional resource models.
  • Timing functions under task conditions were power functions, deviating from attention theory predictions.
  • Functions under no-task conditions had steeper slopes than under task conditions.

Conclusions:

  • While attention models explain some findings, power functions under task conditions suggest alternative mechanisms.
  • Different sensory inputs may mediate time perception depending on task presence.
  • The study supports a perceptual hypothesis differentiating timing mechanisms under task and no-task conditions.