Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Learning to see random-dot stereograms.

A J O'Toole1, D J Kersten

  • 1School of Human Development, University of Texas, Dallas, Richardson 75083-0688.

Perception
|January 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Associative learning of scene parameters from images.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

The face typicality-recognizability relationship: encoding or retrieval locus?

Memory & cognition·2001
Same author

On the other side of the mean: the perception of dissimilarity in human faces.

Perception·2001
Same author

Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects.

Nature neuroscience·2001
Same author

Recognition and sex categorization of adults' and children's faces: examining performance in the absence of sex-stereotyped cues.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2000
Same author

Three-dimensional shape and two-dimensional surface reflectance contributions to face recognition: an application of three-dimensional morphing.

Vision research·2000
Same journal

Predictive models and parameter analysis for multiple tactile perceptions in skin-wet fabrics interface.

Perception·2026
Same journal

High-resolution kitsch by AI: Why society needs art, not more AI content.

Perception·2026
Same journal

Benchmarking spatial discrimination thresholds of two-frame motion defined forms compared to luminance and stereoscopic defined forms.

Perception·2026
Same journal

The effect of face masks on the perception of trustworthiness and competence in individuals with autistic traits.

Perception·2026
Same journal

The importance of external features for categorizing ethnicity: can Koreans identify Korean, Japanese, and Chinese faces?

Perception·2026
Same journal

Interoception, alexithymia, and motor congruency: Psychological drivers of body ownership in virtual reality.

Perception·2026
See all related articles

Perceptual learning in random-dot stereograms is influenced by visual attention and monocular pattern recognition. Depth edges are not learned, but internal depth regions are, especially when ambiguous, impacting depth perception.

Area of Science:

  • Visual perception
  • Cognitive psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Random-dot stereograms (RDS) are crucial for studying binocular vision and depth perception.
  • Previous research suggested RDS lack monocularly useful forms, limiting learning potential.
  • Understanding learning effects in RDS is key to deciphering visual processing and attention.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of selective visual attention in position-specific learning effects of RDS.
  • To examine the learnability of monocular RDS patterns and their impact on depth perception.
  • To differentiate the learning of binocular surface properties: depth edges versus internal depth regions.

Main Methods:

  • Reproduced retinal position-specific learning effects in RDS.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Manipulated visual attention to assess its role in learning specificity.
  • Tested observers' ability to learn monocular RDS patterns.
  • Investigated learning of depth edges and internal depth regions in binocular RDS.
  • Introduced ambiguity in internal depth regions to study depth edge learning.

    • Main Results:

    • Position-specific learning in RDS is mediated by selective visual attention.
    • Monocular RDS patterns are learnable to some extent, facilitating depth perception.
    • Depth edges of RDS are generally not learned, unlike internal depth regions.
    • Depth edges become learnable when internal depth regions are ambiguous.

    Conclusions:

    • Perceptual learning in RDS is influenced by the type of stimulus and attentional mechanisms.
    • The learnability of monocular patterns challenges traditional views on RDS.
    • Learning of binocular features in RDS depends on stimulus properties, with internal regions being more susceptible to learning than edges.