Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Force and timing components of the motor program.

R B Ivry1

  • 1University of Oregon, USA.

Journal of Motor Behavior
|December 1, 1986
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Personalized transcranial alternating current stimulation improves sleep quality: Initial findings.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2023
Same author

Individual differences in TMS sensitivity influence the efficacy of tDCS in facilitating sensorimotor adaptation.

Brain stimulation·2019
Same author

Reduced Timing Variability in Patients with Unilateral Cerebellar Lesions during Bimanual Movements.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

Impaired velocity perception in patients with lesions of the cerebellum.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

Timing functions of the cerebellum.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

Neural mechanisms of timing.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2011

This study reveals that reaction time is influenced by timing variations, not force magnitude. A motor programming model dissociates force and timing, suggesting separate programming for force activation and deactivation.

Area of Science:

  • Motor control
  • Human movement science
  • Cognitive psychology

Background:

  • Reaction time is a fundamental measure in understanding motor control.
  • Previous models often treated force and timing as intertwined components of motor programming.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the independent effects of force and timing variations on simple and choice reaction time.
  • To develop and test a refined model of motor programming that dissociates force and timing components.
  • To explore the subcomponents of force programming: activation and deactivation.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted manipulating force and timing parameters.
  • Simple and choice reaction time tasks were employed.
  • Analysis focused on latency and response maintenance variations.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Reaction time latency was unaffected by force variations.
  • Timing variations, specifically response maintenance, significantly altered reaction time.
  • Force programming was further divided into activation and deactivation subcomponents.
  • Force deactivation could be programmed online if sufficient time was available between subcomponents.
  • Experiment 3 demonstrated that force activation and deactivation can be pre-programmed as a single component.

Conclusions:

  • Force and timing are dissociated components within motor programming.
  • The model distinguishes between program construction and implementation operations.
  • Motor programs allow for online adjustments and pre-programming of force components based on timing constraints.