Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Isn't there a catch in it somewhere?

H T Whiting1

  • 1Vakgroep Psychologie, IFLO, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Journal of Motor Behavior
|December 1, 1986
PubMed
Summary

This study critically evaluates the role of vision in one-handed catching. It questions the necessity of seeing the hand for optimal performance, referencing earlier research and highlighting methodological issues.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The effects of personality and ability on speed of decisions regarding the directional aspects of ball flight.

Journal of motor behavior·2013
Same author

The development of a simple ballistic skill with and without visual control.

Journal of motor behavior·2013
Same author

The effect of exercise on the visual and auditory acuity of table-tennis players.

Journal of motor behavior·2013
Same author

Dynamic visual acuity and performance in a catching task.

Journal of motor behavior·2013
Same author

Exposure and occluded duration effects in a ball-catching skill.

Journal of motor behavior·2013
Same author

Visual occlusion factors in a discrete ball-catching task.

Journal of motor behavior·2013

Area of Science:

  • Motor control
  • Human movement science
  • Perceptual-motor integration

Background:

  • Fischman and Schneider (1985) investigated skill, vision, and proprioception in one-handed catching.
  • Their work suggested a necessity for visual feedback of the hand for optimal performance.
  • Previous studies offer alternative perspectives on visual requirements in motor tasks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the claims regarding the necessity of vision for one-handed catching performance.
  • To analyze the methodological and interpretative issues in Fischman and Schneider's (1985) research.
  • To contextualize findings within the broader literature on motor skill acquisition and visual guidance.

Main Methods:

  • Critical analysis of existing literature.
  • Comparative review of methodological approaches in motor control research.
  • Re-evaluation of data interpretation in the context of visual-motor skills.

Main Results:

  • The necessity of direct hand visualization for optimal catching performance is questioned.
  • Methodological limitations and potential biases in the evaluated research are identified.
  • Discrepancies with earlier findings on visual requirements in motor tasks are highlighted.

Conclusions:

  • The role of vision in one-handed catching may be less critical than suggested by Fischman and Schneider (1985).
  • Further research with robust methodologies is needed to clarify the precise contribution of vision and proprioception.
  • Understanding visual-motor dependencies requires careful consideration of task specifics and experimental design.

Related Experiment Videos