Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The Clinical Support Systems Program: supporting system-wide improvement.

Jenni A Leigh1, Paul W Long, Bruce H Barraclough

  • 1Health Program Evaluation Unit, BearingPoint Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

The Medical Journal of Australia
|May 14, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Australian doctors are more engaged than UK doctors: why is this the case?

BMJ leader·2022
Same author

Factors that influence and change medical engagement in Australian not for profit hospitals.

Journal of health organization and management·2022
Same author

Priorities for professionalism: what do surgeons think?

The Medical journal of Australia·2015
Same author

Educational and health impact of the Baume Report: 'A Cutting Edge: Australia's Surgical Workforce'.

Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association·2014
Same author

Knowledge, skills, and attitudes of medical students to patient safety: a cross-sectional pilot investigation in China.

Journal of evidence-based medicine·2013
Same author

Patient safety education for undergraduate medical students: a systematic review.

BMC medical education·2011
Same journal

Responding to the Revised First Nations Health and Cultural Safety Accreditation Standards in Australian Primary Medical Education: Institutional Principles and Qualities for Meaningful Progress.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026
Same journal

Multimorbidity Clusters Among People Aged 65 Years and Over in Australia: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Data Linkage Study.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026
Same journal

Reducing Nitrous Oxide Emissions Across the Melbourne Biomedical Precinct.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026
Same journal

Still Treating Yesterday's Risk? Reconsidering Antiviral Use for Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 Cases in a Broadly Immune Population.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026
Same journal

Striving for Racial Equity in Oral Cancer Research: A Case Study.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026
Same journal

Progressing Cross-Sector Collaboration for People With Eating Disorders and Higher Weight: Priority Actions From an Expert Roundtable Using a Modified Nominal Group Technique.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026
See all related articles

The Clinical Support Systems Program (CSSP) facilitated a shift towards patient-centred, evidence-based care. This initiative highlighted the need for better data systems, teamwork, and organizational support to improve healthcare quality.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Management
  • Clinical Quality Improvement
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • The existing healthcare structure often hinders patient-centred, evidence-based care.
  • The Clinical Support Systems Program (CSSP) was established to address these systemic issues.
  • Significant government support and clinician engagement were crucial for the program's initiation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of the CSSP on transforming healthcare delivery.
  • To identify key factors enabling and hindering the implementation of improved patient care models.
  • To understand the broader implications of the CSSP for healthcare quality and safety.

Main Methods:

  • The CSSP involved a multi-faceted approach to system-wide change.

Related Experiment Videos

  • It fostered collaboration among clinical champions, healthcare professionals, consumers, and managers.
  • The program's success was assessed through observed changes in care structures and culture.

    • Main Results:

    • The CSSP achieved extensive changes, moving towards patient-centred, evidence-based care.
    • It demonstrated that quality care requires more than just clinician effort, emphasizing systemic support.
    • Key enablers for improvement included accurate data systems, teamwork, and organizational commitment.

    Conclusions:

    • The CSSP successfully stimulated system-wide improvements in healthcare quality.
    • Collaboration and robust data infrastructure are essential for overcoming barriers in complex healthcare systems.
    • The program's experience provided valuable lessons for national health quality initiatives.