Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Mechanism involvement during skill imagery.

R M Kohl1, D L Roenker

  • 1Department of Psychology, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green 42101, USA.

Journal of Motor Behavior
|June 1, 1983
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

(Non)Issues of infinite regress in modeling motor behavior.

Journal of motor behavior·2009
Same author

Visual and medical risk factors for motor vehicle collision involvement among older drivers.

The British journal of ophthalmology·2008
Same author

The impact of speed of processing training on cognitive and everyday performance.

Aging & mental health·2005
Same author

Knowledge of results for motor learning: relationship between error estimation and knowledge of results frequency.

Journal of motor behavior·2001
Same author

A note on state individual differences in accuracy of response imagery: aftereffects and reminiscence.

Brain and cognition·1998
Same author

Driving avoidance and functional impairment in older drivers.

Accident; analysis and prevention·1998

Mental imagery practice enhances motor skill performance. This study supports the outflow explanation, suggesting cognitive motor programs, not sensory feedback, drive improvements from imagery practice.

Area of Science:

  • Motor Learning
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Sports Science

Background:

  • Motor skill acquisition theories propose two main mechanisms for mental imagery practice: in-flow (proprioceptive feedback) and outflow (cognitive motor programs).
  • Understanding which mechanism underlies imagery's effectiveness is crucial for optimizing training strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To differentiate between in-flow and outflow explanations of mental imagery's impact on motor task performance.
  • To investigate the role of cognitive operations versus sensory feedback in skill imagery.

Main Methods:

  • A rotary pursuit task was used to compare unilateral and bilateral transfer effects.
  • Participants underwent either physical practice or mental imagery practice.
  • Performance transfer was assessed across different practice conditions.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • All practice groups (physical and imagery) demonstrated positive transfer compared to a no-practice control group.
  • Physical practice showed greater unilateral transfer than bilateral transfer.
  • Imagery practice yielded no significant difference between unilateral and bilateral transfer.

Conclusions:

  • The findings support the outflow explanation, indicating that cognitive motor programs are the primary mechanism for skill improvement through mental imagery.
  • This suggests mental imagery facilitates performance by activating and refining motor programs, rather than relying on proprioceptive feedback.