Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Why cooperate? An economic perspective is not enough.

Richard Schuster1, Amir Perelberg

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Haifa, Haifa 31905, Israel. Schuster@psy.haifa.ac.il

Behavioural Processes
|May 26, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Rats preferred cooperation over individual tasks when outcomes were equal, showing social factors drive cooperative choices beyond economic gains. This highlights the intrinsic rewards of social bonds in promoting cooperation.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Balancing land use for conservation, agriculture, and renewable energy.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Genetic and phenotypic evidence suggest the existence of indigenous olive population of wild var. sylvestris in the Carmel coast, southern Levant.

BMC plant biology·2024
Same author

Systematic conservation prioritization with the prioritizr R package.

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology·2024
Same author

Mapping the planet's critical areas for biodiversity and nature's contributions to people.

Nature communications·2024
Same author

Protected area planning to conserve biodiversity in an uncertain future.

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology·2023
Same author

Mapping the planet's critical natural assets.

Nature ecology & evolution·2022

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral science
  • Evolutionary biology
  • Animal behavior

Background:

  • Traditional models of cooperation emphasize economic outcomes and downplay social dimensions.
  • Skinnerian and game-theory models often use isolated subjects, neglecting the social context of real-world cooperation.
  • Cooperative behaviors are intrinsically social, influenced by familiar partners, unlike non-cooperative actions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether social dimensions explain cooperation beyond mere behavioral descriptions.
  • To determine the relative importance of economic versus social factors in cooperative choices.
  • To examine how social cooperation influences preference in decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Experimental setup with two interconnected chambers for laboratory rats.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Pairs of rats received rewards for coordinated shuttling (cooperation).
  • Individual rats received rewards for isolated shuttling, with equalized outcomes between conditions.

    • Main Results:

    • A majority of subjects preferred the cooperation option when tangible outcomes were equalized.
    • The rate of reinforcement during cooperation did not strongly predict choice.
    • Higher levels of intra-pair coordination positively correlated with preference for cooperation.

    Conclusions:

    • Social dimensions, not just economic outcomes, significantly influence cooperative choices.
    • Intrinsic reinforcements from cooperating may drive preferences, impacting evolutionary fitness through relationships.
    • Cooperative relationships can have long-term fitness consequences beyond immediate tangible rewards.