Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Eugenic values.

D Wikler

    Science in Context
    |June 1, 2004
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Eugenics, often condemned for racism and bias, may have core ethical issues distinct from these societal harms. Its moral dilemmas align with public health, centering on distributive justice.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    [Intraoperative MRI and epilepsy surgery].

    Neuro-Chirurgie·2008
    Same author

    Apparent diffusion coefficient and cerebral blood volume in brain gliomas: relation to tumor cell density and tumor microvessel density based on stereotactic biopsies.

    AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2007
    Same author

    Unconditional compensation: reducing the costs of disagreement about compensation for research subjects.

    Eastern Mediterranean health journal = La revue de sante de la Mediterranee orientale = al-Majallah al-sihhiyah li-sharq al-mutawassit·2007
    Same author

    Stereotactic comparison among cerebral blood volume, methionine uptake, and histopathology in brain glioma.

    AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2007
    Same author

    [Transsphenoidal approach with low field MRI for pituitary adenoma].

    Neuro-Chirurgie·2006
    Same author

    The Zeiss-MKM system for frameless image-guided approach in epidural motor cortex stimulation for central neuropathic pain.

    Neurosurgical focus·2006
    Same journal

    The subject is the object: On the emergence of subjective science in thirteenth-century theology.

    Science in context·2026
    Same journal

    Albertus Magnus on Alchemy: Between <i>Ars</i> and <i>Scientia</i>.

    Science in context·2026
    Same journal

    Rubbing salted butter into the wound: Jungius and division.

    Science in context·2026
    Same journal

    Names, knowledge, and formats: Transformations of oceanic literacy.

    Science in context·2026
    Same journal

    Imaging a black hole shadow through the Event Horizon Telescope: A study in scientific collaboration and its epistemic constraints.

    Science in context·2026
    Same journal

    Taking nature: Collecting and the exercise of colonial power.

    Science in context·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Bioethics
    • Public Health Ethics
    • Social Philosophy

    Background:

    • Eugenics is widely condemned, often attributed to racism, class bias, and reproductive rights violations.
    • These societal harms, while significant, may not represent the fundamental ethical flaw of eugenics itself.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To identify the core moral sin of eugenics, separating it from its historically tainted applications.
    • To explore alternative ethical frameworks for understanding eugenics' inherent problems.

    Main Methods:

    • Conceptual analysis of eugenics and its historical manifestations.
    • Comparison of eugenics' ethical challenges with those in public health.
    • Examination of distributive justice principles in relation to eugenic concepts.
    Keywords:
    Genetics and Reproduction

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • The core ethical issues of eugenics are distinct from racism, class bias, and reproductive coercion.
    • Potential inherent wrongs in eugenics include statism and the difficulty of defining an 'ideal' human.
    • Eugenics shares significant moral dilemmas with public health, particularly concerning distributive justice.

    Conclusions:

    • The fundamental ethical critique of eugenics lies in its distributive justice implications, not solely in its historical abuses.
    • Understanding eugenics through the lens of public health ethics offers a more nuanced ethical evaluation.
    • Addressing the moral dilemmas of eugenics requires careful consideration of resource allocation and societal benefit.