Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Processing polarity items: contrastive licensing costs.

Douglas Saddy1, Heiner Drenhaus, Stefan Frisch

  • 1Institute of Linguistics, University of Potsdam, P.O. Box 601553, 14415 Potsdam, Germany. saddy@ling.uni-potsdam.de

Brain and Language
|June 3, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Flatter Hierarchies and Enhanced Communication: Perceptions of Interprofessional Collaboration in Community-Based Psychiatric Teams].

Psychiatrische Praxis·2026
Same author

One hundred years of neuropsychology: Kurt Goldstein's seminal paper on the inherent complexity of symptoms.

Dementia & neuropsychologia·2025
Same author

Not primed to agree? Short or no effect of rhythmic priming on typical adults processing number agreement.

Frontiers in psychology·2025
Same author

The temporal organization and quality of life story memories in Alzheimer disease and healthy controls.

Neuropsychology·2025
Same author

[Multi-professional Clearing in a Model Project based on § 64b SGB V by the Example of Geriatric Psychiatry].

Psychiatrische Praxis·2025
Same author

How useful is the Frontal Assessment Battery in the assessment of inhibitory control?

International journal of geriatric psychiatry·2023
Same journal

Measuring language proficiency in bilingual children using EEG-based neural tracking of continuous speech.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Inhibitory states modulate the processing of negated concepts in existential sentences. Evidence from ERPs" [Brain Lang. 105796].

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Evaluative processing of emotional and moral content during discourse comprehension: Insights from event-related brain potentials.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Reading-selective areas in the cerebellum in adult readers.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Effects of semantic distance and metaphorical constituent position on L2 noun-noun metaphor processing: an ERP study.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Cortical tracking of natural speech by children with developmental language disorder (DLD): An EEG speech decoding investigation.

Brain and language·2026
See all related articles

Investigating German polarity items with event-related brain potentials (ERPs), this study found distinct brain responses for positive versus negative polarity violations. Both violations caused semantic integration costs, but positive violations also showed increased processing complexity.

Area of Science:

  • Linguistics
  • Psycholinguistics
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Polarity items are linguistic expressions sensitive to their syntactic context.
  • Understanding how the brain processes violations of polarity licensing is crucial for psycholinguistics.
  • Previous research has not fully elucidated the distinct neural mechanisms underlying positive versus negative polarity item licensing failures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the neural correlates of licensing failures for positive and negative polarity items in German.
  • To differentiate the cognitive and neural processes involved in processing these two types of polarity violations.
  • To determine if distinct mechanisms underlie the processing of positive and negative polarity items.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing event-related brain potentials (ERPs) to measure brain activity.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Designing an experiment to elicit violations of positive and negative polarity item licensing in German sentences.
  • Analyzing ERP components, specifically the N400 and P600, associated with these violations.

    • Main Results:

    • Failure to license both negative and positive polarity items elicited an N400 component, indicating semantic integration costs.
    • Failure to license positive polarity items additionally elicited a P600 component.
    • The presence of an additional P600 for positive polarity violations suggests increased processing complexity, possibly due to a negative operator.

    Conclusions:

    • The processing of negative and positive polarity item licensing failures involves distinct neural mechanisms.
    • The N400 reflects a general semantic integration cost applicable to both violation types.
    • The P600 component associated with positive polarity violations may indicate a distinct grammatical or complexity-related processing stage.