Related Experiment Videos
Intestinal obstruction in patients with widespread intraabdominal malignancy.
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
|August 1, 1992
Summary
For widespread intraabdominal malignancy causing intestinal obstruction, conservative management offers palliation and improved quality of life. Surgical intervention in these patients leads to high morbidity and mortality rates.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Gastroenterology
- Surgical Oncology
Background:
- Intestinal obstruction is a frequent complication in patients with advanced intraabdominal malignancy.
- Management strategies for malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) aim to relieve symptoms and maintain quality of life.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the clinical course and outcomes of patients with widespread intraabdominal malignancy and intestinal obstruction.
- To compare the efficacy and safety of conservative versus surgical management for malignant bowel obstruction.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 28 patients with surgically documented widespread intraabdominal malignancy and intestinal obstruction.
- Analysis of response to initial conservative management (e.g., medical therapy).
- Evaluation of outcomes for patients undergoing surgical treatment, including morbidity and mortality.
Main Results:
- 13 out of 26 patients (50%) responded to initial conservative management.
- Surgical treatment in 10 patients resulted in 80% morbidity and 40% mortality.
- Reobstruction occurred in 11 patients, with poor response to therapy and short life expectancy.
Conclusions:
- Conservative management should be prioritized for intestinal obstruction due to widespread intraabdominal malignancy.
- Focus on palliation of symptoms and maintenance of quality of life is crucial.
- Surgical intervention is associated with significant risks and limited benefits in this patient population.