Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Are data from different gene expression microarray platforms comparable?

Anna-Kaarina Järvinen1, Sampsa Hautaniemi, Henrik Edgren

  • 1Biomedicum Biochip Center, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 63, Room A415b, 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland.

Genomics
|June 5, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Early Gut Microbiome Alterations in Mild Cognitive Impairment Reflect Changes in Alzheimer Disease.

Alzheimer disease and associated disorders·2026
Same author

Gut Microbiome Differences Between Early Alzheimer Disease and Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus.

Alzheimer disease and associated disorders·2026
Same author

Homozygous loss-of-function mutation in SIT1 leads to combined immunodeficiency due to dysregulated T-cell receptor signaling.

The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology·2026
Same author

Pharmacogenomics of response to interferon-beta and glatiramer acetate in Multiple Sclerosis: A multi-centric study.

Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)·2026
Same author

Mosaic variegated aneuploidy as a novel feature in patients with Mulibrey nanism and <i>TRIM37</i> variants.

Journal of medical genetics·2026
Same author

The Late Quaternary climate impact on the genome of the woodland strawberry (Fragaria vesca), a perennial herb.

Communications biology·2026
Same journal

Integrating transcriptomics and metabolomics reveals the molecular landscape of sperm maturation driven by regional differentiation in the epididymis of Guizhou-Guiqian semi-fine wool sheep.

Genomics·2026
Same journal

Impact of genotype on histopathology and clinical characters in a Chinese cohort with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Genomics·2026
Same journal

A novel reusable transcriptome-wide association study workflow used to map key genes linked to important cattle traits.

Genomics·2026
Same journal

The large mitochondrial genome of Syndiclis anlungensis (Lauraceae): Genome structure, comparative analysis, and phylogenetic relationships with other Syndiclis species.

Genomics·2026
Same journal

DeepGEP: Deep learning for gene expression prediction from multi-omics in mammals.

Genomics·2026
Same journal

Molecular features of external Auditory Canal cholesteatoma by microbial metagenomic sequencing.

Genomics·2026
See all related articles

Comparing gene expression microarray platforms revealed lower concordance with custom arrays due to errors. Combining data from different microarray platforms presents challenges for diagnostic applications.

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Microarray technology is crucial for large-scale gene expression analysis.
  • Various commercial and custom microarray platforms are available.
  • Assessing platform concordance is vital for reliable data interpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the concordance between different microarray platforms.
  • To identify sources of discrepancy in gene expression data.
  • To assess the feasibility of combining data from diverse microarray platforms.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of breast cancer cell lines using three microarray platforms: in situ synthesized oligonucleotide arrays (Affymetrix HG-U95v2), commercial cDNA microarrays (Agilent Human 1 cDNA), and custom-made cDNA microarrays.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Statistical correlation analysis of gene expression data across platforms.

    • Main Results:

    • Commercial microarray platforms demonstrated good correlation (r = 0.78-0.86).
    • Lower correlations were observed between custom-made and commercial platforms (r = 0.62-0.76).
    • Discrepancies were attributed to clone errors, outdated annotations, and unknown factors in custom arrays.

    Conclusions:

    • Combining gene expression data from different microarray platforms is complex.
    • Data variability across platforms poses a significant challenge for developing diagnostic microarray applications.