Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Predicting stuttering from phonetic complexity in German.

Katharina Dworzynski1, Peter Howell

  • 1Department of Psychology, Centre for Human Communications, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, England, UK.

Journal of Fluency Disorders
|June 5, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Systematic Review on Patient and Public Involvement in Research on Childhood Communication Difficulties.

International journal of language & communication disorders·2026
Same author

Interplay of mental state, personality, and popularity among peers in shaping belongingness of first-year students: A cross-sectional study.

PLOS mental health·2026
Same author

Nonword Repetition Assessment of Children Who Stutter: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Scoring Procedures.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2026
Same author

Phoneme Manner Types and Function and Content Words as Biomarkers for Different Types of Stutters in Speakers Who Continue to Stutter.

International journal of language & communication disorders·2026
Same author

Should antidepressants be prescribed simply if it is the patient's preference?

The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners·2026
Same author

Corrigendum: Comparison of performance of automatic recognizers for stutters in speech trained with event or interval markers.

Frontiers in psychology·2024
Same journal

Understanding stuttering through the lens of women who stutter: A reflexive thematic analysis of the women who stutter podcast.

Journal of fluency disorders·2026
Same journal

Stuttering and career: Shaping professional paths amid restrictions.

Journal of fluency disorders·2026
Same journal

Relationships between psychosocial aspects of stuttering and self-disclosure of stuttering in a Japanese sample.

Journal of fluency disorders·2026
Same journal

Stuttering representation on Arabic-language Instagram: Who speaks and what gains visibility.

Journal of fluency disorders·2026
Same journal

How does ChatGPT respond to stuttering-related frequently asked questions? A mixed-methods, cross-version comparison.

Journal of fluency disorders·2026
Same journal

Exploration of parents' and children's perspectives of change following Palin Stammering Therapy for school aged Children (aged 8-14).

Journal of fluency disorders·2026
See all related articles

Phonetic complexity impacts stuttering rates in German content words for older children and adults, unlike function words. German content words show higher complexity than English, with word shape being a key factor.

Area of Science:

  • Linguistics
  • Speech Pathology
  • Developmental Psychology

Background:

  • Stuttering is influenced by linguistic factors, including phonetic complexity.
  • Previous research indicated varying effects of phonetic complexity on stuttering across languages like Spanish and English.
  • Developmental changes in speech production may interact with phonetic complexity and stuttering.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between phonetic complexity and stuttering rate in German across different age groups.
  • To compare the phonetic complexity of German and English words.
  • To identify specific phonetic characteristics influencing stuttering in German.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized Jakielski's index of phonetic complexity (IPC) to score German words on eight characteristics.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessed stuttering rate in relation to IPC scores for function and content words.
  • Compared IPC scores and stuttering rates between German and English words, and across different age groups.

    • Main Results:

    • No correlation between stuttering rate and IPC score for German function words.
    • Significant correlations found between stuttering rate and IPC score for German content words in children over six and adults.
    • German content words exhibited higher mean IPC scores than English counterparts, with a larger IPC difference between fluent and stuttered words.
    • Factor 5 (word shape) significantly influenced stuttering rates in both German age groups.

    Conclusions:

    • Phonetic complexity, particularly word shape, plays a significant role in stuttering for German content words in older children and adults.
    • Developmental and linguistic differences exist in how phonetic complexity affects stuttering.
    • The findings suggest language-specific and age-dependent patterns in the relationship between phonetic complexity and stuttering.