Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Hypersensitivity to preservatives.

Denis Sasseville1

  • 1Division of Dermatology, McGill University Health Centre, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. denis.sasseville@mcgill.ca

Dermatologic Therapy
|June 10, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Are We Reading Patch Test Reactions in a Uniform Way? An International Contact Dermatitis Research Group Study.

Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug·2025
Same author

Photopatch testing: Clinical characteristics, test results, and final diagnoses from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 2009-2020.

Contact dermatitis·2024
Same author

Nonmedical Adhesive Allergens: Retrospective Analysis of Cross-Sectional Data From the North American Contact Dermatitis® Group, 2001-2018.

Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug·2024
Same author

Patch Testing With Nickel, Cobalt, and Chromium in Patients With Suspected Allergic Contact Dermatitis.

Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug·2023
Same author

A case-control pharmacovigilance study of TNF-alpha inhibitors and interleukin inhibitors on tuberculosis, Candida, lymphoma and suicidality using the FAERS database (2014-2020).

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology·2023
Same author

Patch Testing With Cobalt in Adults: A North American Contact Dermatitis Group Experience, 2001-2018.

Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug·2023
Same journal

Increased Risk of Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Development after Dupilumab Use for Atopic Dermatitis.

Dermatologic therapy·2024
Same journal

Correction to "Adjuvant PD-1 inhibitor versus high-dose interferon α-2b for Chinese patients with cutaneous and acral melanoma: A retrospective cohort analysis".

Dermatologic therapy·2022
Same journal

A case of erythema nodosum concomitant with ulcerative colitis relieved by tofacitinib.

Dermatologic therapy·2022
Same journal

A case report of vitiligo following toripalimab therapy for a patient with metastatic melanoma.

Dermatologic therapy·2022
Same journal

High versus low dose oral isotretinoin in the treatment of cutaneous and genital warts.

Dermatologic therapy·2022
Same journal

Evaluation of the efficacy and relapse rates of treatment protocols for moderate acne using isotretinoin based on the global acne grading system: Randomized, controlled, comparative study.

Dermatologic therapy·2022
See all related articles

Parabens remain widely used cosmetic preservatives despite industry efforts to replace them. Current evidence suggests parabens are less sensitizing than many newer preservative alternatives.

Area of Science:

  • Cosmetic Science
  • Dermatology
  • Microbiology

Background:

  • Preservatives are essential biocidal agents in cosmetics, medicaments, and consumer goods to prevent microbial spoilage and infection.
  • The development of an ideal preservative, balancing efficacy with minimal irritant or sensitizing potential, remains an ongoing challenge.
  • Commonly used preservatives include parabens, formaldehyde-releasers, and isothiazolinones, with newer agents also emerging.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the key classes of preservatives used in various products.
  • To analyze their chemical properties, antimicrobial efficacy, and safety profiles.
  • To discuss cutaneous adverse reactions, sensitization potential, and cross-reactivity patterns.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of preservatives, focusing on parabens, formaldehyde-releasers, and isothiazolinones.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of chemical characteristics, antimicrobial efficacy, and exposure data.
  • Evaluation of reported cutaneous adverse reactions, patch testing results, and sensitization rates.

    • Main Results:

    • Parabens, despite being targeted for replacement, are still the most frequently used cosmetic biocides.
    • Newer preservative alternatives have been introduced, including Euxyl K 400 and isopropynyl butylcarbamate.
    • Parabens appear to have a lower sensitization potential compared to many newer preservative agents.

    Conclusions:

    • The ideal preservative has yet to be identified, highlighting the need for continued research.
    • Parabens demonstrate a favorable safety profile regarding skin sensitization compared to some alternatives.
    • Understanding the efficacy and safety of different preservative classes is crucial for product formulation and consumer safety.