Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 24, 2026

Myocardial Infarction and Functional Outcome Assessment in Pigs
Published on: April 25, 2014
Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count with angiographically normal coronary arteries and its relationship
Kurtuluş Ozdemir1, Bülent B Altunkeser, Ayşe Ozdemir
1Department of Cardiology, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey. kurt33@hotmail.com
Insights
The thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count (TFC) varies in normal coronary arteries and correlates with exercise test results. Factors like sex and artery size influence TFC, potentially explaining false positives in exercise tests.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Diagnostic Imaging
- Physiology
Background:
- The thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count (TFC) is a quantitative method for assessing coronary blood flow.
- Normal TFC values and their relationship with exercise testing (ET) have not been extensively studied.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine normal TFC values in coronary arteries.
- To investigate the correlation between normal TFC and ST-segment depression during ET.
Main Methods:
- TFC was measured in 116 patients with normal coronary arteries who underwent ET.
- ST-segment depression was evaluated using 12-lead electrocardiograms.
- Correlations between TFC, ST-segment depression, sex, and coronary artery diameter were analyzed.
Main Results:
- TFC was significantly higher in the left anterior descending (LAD) artery compared to the left circumflex (LCx) and right coronary arteries (RCA).
- Patients with positive ET results showed significantly higher TFC values across all measured arteries.
- TFC correlated significantly with the sum of ST-segment depression and was influenced by coronary artery diameter and sex (lower in women for LAD).
Conclusions:
- Normal TFC differs among LAD, LCx, and RCA.
- Higher TFC in ET-positive patients with normal coronaries may contribute to false-positive ET results.
- Sex and coronary artery diameter are important factors to consider when interpreting TFC.
Background:
The thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count (TFC) has been proposed as a simple, reproducible, objective and quantitative method to assess coronary blood flow. However, the TFC in normal coronary arteries has not been investigated in detail. The aim of this study was to determine normal TFC values and investigate their correlation with ST-segment depression during exercise testing (ET).
Methods And Results:
The TFC was measured in 116 cases with normal coronary arteries who underwent ET. The ST segment was evaluated on 12-lead electrocardiograms at 60 ms after the J-point. Horizontal or downsloping ST-segment depression of > or = 0.5 mm was recorded and the sum of the depressions was calculated. When ST-segment depression > or = 1 mm compared to the level of PR segment on two or more leads was detected, the test was accepted as positive. The TFC for the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) was significantly higher than those for the left circumflex coronary artery (LCx) and the right coronary artery (RCA). The TFC of coronary arteries was significantly higher in patients with ET positive (for LAD, 39.5 +/- 10.7 compared with 30.1 +/- 7.6 frames; for LCx, 29.2 +/- 9.3 compared with 23.6 +/- 6.5 frames; and for RCA, 30.7 +/- 11 compared with 23.7 +/- 7 frames; P < 0.001 for overall comparisons). Women had a lower TFC than men in the LAD. Moreover, it was determined that the TFC values for the LAD, LCx and RCA significantly correlated with the sum of ST-segment depression (r = 0.57, r = 0.46 and r = 0.41, respectively, P < 0.001 for overall correlations). It was also determined that the TFC was affected by the proximal diameter of the coronary arteries.
Conclusions:
The results of this study highlight the differences of the TFC in normal LAD, LCx and RCA. In patients with normal coronary arteries, the fact that the TFC is higher in ET-positive than in ET-negative patients may explain false positive results of ET. Sex and coronary artery diameter should be taken into consideration in evaluating the TFC.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
