Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Orienting task specificity in incidental motor learning.

L Ho1, J B Shea

  • 1Department of Physical Education and Recreation, Univerisity of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.

Journal of Motor Behavior
|June 1, 1979
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Data driven identification and classification of Chinese medicine syndrome types among functional dyspepsia patients: latent tree analysis (abridged secondary publication).

Hong Kong medical journal = Xianggang yi xue za zhi·2024
Same author

Genetic polymorphism in <i>Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase chloride transport protein 6</i> (<i>MTHFR CLCN6</i>) gene is associated with keratinocyte skin cancer in a cohort of renal transplant recipients.

Skin health and disease·2022
Same author

MATTHEW-WOOD SYNDROME: A CASE WITH DEXTROCARDIA AND STREAK GONADS.

Genetic counseling (Geneva, Switzerland)·2018
Same author

External Control of Knowledge of Results: Learner Involvement Enhances Motor Skill Transfer.

Perceptual and motor skills·2018
Same author

Pacemaker-induced R-on-T phenomenon leading to ventricular fibrillation post cardiac surgery.

Anaesthesia and intensive care·2015
Same author

A comprehensive study of current haemophilia care and outcomes in Singapore.

Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia·2015
Same journal

Expertise Modulates Anticipatory Synergy Adjustments in a Rapid Motor Skill Under Temporal Constraints.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

A Boundary of Ideomotor Control: Semantic Labels Bias Selection but Do Not Tune Motor Execution.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Strategies When Choosing Between Movement Options in a Sequential Task.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined with Neurofunctional Motor Training in Autistic Children: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Individualized Virtual Angle Offset Training for Patients with Stroke.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

The Role of Exploratory Procedures in Perceiving Affordances in a Bimanual Wielding Task.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
See all related articles

Verbalizing task instructions during incidental learning improved memory retention of linear movement. Participants who estimated distances or discriminated between positions recalled them with less error than those who did not verbalize.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Memory Research
  • Incidental Learning

Background:

  • Understanding memory retention is crucial for cognitive science.
  • Incidental learning paradigms explore memory without explicit study instructions.
  • The levels of processing framework suggests deeper cognitive engagement enhances memory.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how different orienting tasks affect memory for linear movement.
  • To examine the role of verbalization in incidental learning.
  • To test the predictions of the levels of processing framework.

Main Methods:

  • An incidental learning paradigm was used with linear movement tasks.
  • Participants recalled target and non-target positions after presentation trials.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Three groups were compared: verbal estimation, discrimination, and non-verbal response.

    • Main Results:

    • Verbal response groups (estimation and discrimination) showed significantly less recall error.
    • No significant difference in recall error was found between the two verbal response groups.
    • The non-verbalizing group exhibited greater recall error.

    Conclusions:

    • Engaging in verbal tasks during incidental learning enhances memory retention.
    • Deeper cognitive processing, facilitated by verbalization, leads to better recall.
    • Findings support the levels of processing theory in the context of motor memory.