Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Category-based induction: an effect of conclusion typicality.

James A Hampton1, Iben Cannon

  • 1Psychology Department, City University, Northampton Square, London EC1V OHB, England. hampton@city.ac.uk

Memory & Cognition
|June 12, 2004
PubMed
Summary

People are more likely to generalize new properties to typical categories. This study shows conclusion typicality influences category-based induction strength, impacting property projection in reasoning.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Is Concept Appraisal Modulated by Procedural or Declarative Manipulations?

Frontiers in psychology·2022
Same author

Ducks lay eggs and lions have manes: The acceptability of gender-specific minority generic sentences.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2021
Same author

Context effects in similarity judgments.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2021
Same author

Concept Appraisal.

Cognitive science·2021
Same author

What Makes Some Diseases More Typical than Others? A Survey on the Impact of Disease Characteristics and Professional Background on Disease Typicality.

Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing·2020
Same author

Declarative Memory and Structural Language Impairment in Autistic Children and Adolescents.

Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research·2020

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Cognition
  • Inductive Reasoning

Background:

  • Category-based induction involves projecting properties from known classes to new ones within a shared superordinate category.
  • Previous research highlights the influence of similarity between classes (A and B) and the typicality of the source class (A) on inductive argument strength.
  • The impact of the conclusion class's (B) typicality within the superordinate category on argument strength remained unexplored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether the typicality of the conclusion class (B) in a superordinate category affects the strength of category-based inductive arguments.
  • To determine if people are more inclined to project properties to more typical conclusions.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted to assess the effect of conclusion typicality on inductive argument strength.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Experiment 1 utilized multiple regression analysis to examine the relationship between variables.
  • Experiment 3 employed an experimental design, and Experiment 2 controlled for conclusion familiarity as a potential confound.

    • Main Results:

    • A significant effect of conclusion typicality on inductive argument strength was identified.
    • Participants demonstrated a greater willingness to project properties to more typical conclusion categories.
    • Conclusion familiarity was ruled out as a confounding factor influencing the observed effects.

    Conclusions:

    • The typicality of the conclusion class is a crucial factor influencing the perceived strength of category-based inductive arguments.
    • These findings extend current models of category-based induction by incorporating the role of conclusion typicality.
    • Understanding conclusion typicality provides deeper insights into human reasoning and property projection.