Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

To die with dignity.

L Sampaio

    Social Science & Medicine (1982)
    |August 1, 1992
    PubMed
    Summary

    Individuals with terminal illnesses face dilemmas regarding dignified end-of-life choices. This study explores the conflict between state interests and personal autonomy in end-of-life decisions, considering dignity and closure.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Hansen's disease mimicking a systemic vasculitis.

    Acta reumatologica portuguesa·2011
    Same author

    Validation of soft bottom benthic habitats identified by single-beam acoustics.

    Marine pollution bulletin·2005
    Same author

    [The prevalence of measles, rubella, mumps and chickenpox antibodies in a population of health care workers].

    Acta medica portuguesa·1995
    Same author

    [Radiology in endodontics. Radiologic interpretation (author's transl)].

    Revista brasileira de odontologia·1976

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Ethics
    • Philosophy of Medicine
    • Sociology of Health

    Background:

    • Terminal illness presents profound ethical challenges for patients seeking a dignified death.
    • The historical role of religious institutions in defining life and death boundaries is contrasted with state authority.
    • Patient autonomy in end-of-life decisions is increasingly debated within societal and economic contexts.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To examine the ethical quandaries of individuals with terminal diseases desiring a dignified end-of-life.
    • To analyze the tension between state interests and individual rights concerning life and death.
    • To explore the implications of state control over end-of-life decisions and the patient's loss of voice.

    Main Methods:

    • Philosophical inquiry into bioethical principles.
    • Analysis of legal and societal perspectives on autonomy.
    • Examination of the intersection of religion, state, and individual rights in end-of-life care.

    Main Results:

    • The state's increasing authority over end-of-life decisions may diminish individual autonomy and dignity.
    • Societal and economic factors introduce complex considerations into end-of-life choices.
    • The concept of 'closure' and the 'language of the dying' are crucial aspects often overlooked.

    Conclusions:

    • There is a critical need to balance state interests with the individual's right to self-determination in end-of-life care.
    • Listening to the needs and perspectives of terminally ill patients is paramount for ensuring dignity.
    • Further research is required to address the multifaceted nature of dignified dying and patient autonomy.
    Keywords:
    Death and Euthanasia

    Related Experiment Videos