Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Knowledge acquisition, synthesis, and validation: a model for decision support systems.

Eileen S O'Neill1, Nancy M Dluhy, Paul J Fortier

  • 1College of Nursing, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, North Dartmouth, Massachusetts 02747-2300, USA. eoneill@verizon.net

Journal of Advanced Nursing
|June 16, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ambiguity Within Nursing Practice: An Evolutionary Concept Analysis.

Research and theory for nursing practice·2017
Same author

Facilitating the Transition of Nurse Clinician to Nurse Scientist: Significance of Entry PhD Courses.

Journal of professional nursing : official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing·2017
Same author

Artificial neural networks using complex numbers and phase encoded weights.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

The N-CODES project moves to user testing.

Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN·2006
Same author

Coupling the N-CODES system with actual nurse decision-making.

Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN·2006
Same author

Modelling novice clinical reasoning for a computerized decision support system.

Journal of advanced nursing·2004
Same journal

A Study of the Correlation Between Vulnerability to Psychological Crisis and Self-Disclosure in Elderly Patients With Multimorbidity: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Journal of advanced nursing·2026
Same journal

Elderspeak in Healthcare Settings: How Care, Control and Personhood Intersect in Care Communication-A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis.

Journal of advanced nursing·2026
Same journal

A Model for Sustaining Second Victim Peer Support Programs in Healthcare: A Delphi Study.

Journal of advanced nursing·2026
Same journal

The Practice Experience of ICU Nurses in Preventing Pressure Injuries: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis.

Journal of advanced nursing·2026
Same journal

Capturing the Work of Nurses in General Practice: Development and Testing of the OCEAN-GPN Tools.

Journal of advanced nursing·2026
Same journal

The European Parliament's Vote on the EU Health Workforce INI Report: An EFN Commentary.

Journal of advanced nursing·2026
See all related articles

Developing effective clinical decision support systems requires integrating diverse nursing knowledge. This study outlines a comprehensive process to gather and evaluate evidence, ensuring robust decision support for nurses.

Area of Science:

  • Nursing Informatics
  • Health Decision Support Systems
  • Knowledge Management in Healthcare

Background:

  • Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are crucial for nursing practice.
  • Current evidence-gathering methods for CDSS lack breadth.
  • A need exists for improved knowledge acquisition for nursing CDSS.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a comprehensive knowledge development process for nursing CDSS.
  • To establish a foundation of nursing knowledge for decision tools.

Main Methods:

  • Incorporating procedures to uncover, evaluate, and assimilate information.
  • Utilizing both formal and practice-based knowledge sources.
  • Employing clinical experts and a network of practicing clinicians.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The Nurse Computer Decision Support Project (N-CODES) is developing a prototype CDSS.
  • The prototype is built on rules and cases derived from the best available evidence.
  • The process accommodates diverse evidence types for practical decision-making.

Conclusions:

  • The developed process aids in creating robust knowledge domains for nursing CDSS.
  • Innovative approaches include expert and practitioner networks.
  • These strategies support scientists and practitioners in identifying best evidence for CDSS.