Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 23, 2026

A Murine Model of Group B Streptococcus Vaginal Colonization
Published on: November 16, 2016
Laboratory practices for prenatal group B streptococcal screening--seven states, 2003
Insights
Group B Streptococcus (GBS) screening guidelines were updated in 2002. A 2003 survey found high adherence to GBS isolation but room for improvement in antimicrobial susceptibility testing and GBS bacteriuria reporting.
Area of Science:
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Neonatal Health
- Clinical Microbiology
Background:
- Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is a primary cause of serious neonatal infections in the US.
- Guidelines evolved from risk-factor monitoring to universal prenatal screening for GBS.
- 2002 guidelines emphasized GBS screening, antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) for high-risk patients, and GBS urine reporting.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate clinical laboratory adherence to the 2002 GBS screening guidelines.
- To identify areas for improved implementation of GBS diagnostic practices.
Main Methods:
- A survey of clinical laboratories was conducted in 2003 by the CDC's Active Bacterial Core surveillance (ABCs)/Emerging Infections Program Network.
- The survey focused on laboratory practices for prenatal culture processing for GBS.
Main Results:
- Laboratories demonstrated high adherence to GBS isolation procedures.
- Opportunities were identified for enhancing the implementation of antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) recommendations.
- Improvement is needed in reporting GBS in urine specimens (GBS bacteriuria).
Conclusions:
- While GBS isolation methods are widely adopted, consistent application of 2002 guidelines requires attention.
- Enhanced laboratory practices are crucial for optimizing the prevention of perinatal GBS disease.
Abstract:
In the United States, group B streptococcus (GBS) is the leading cause of serious bacterial infections in newborns. In 1996, consensus guidelines for use of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) to prevent perinatal GBS disease recommended either of two methods for identifying candidates for chemoprophylaxis: 1) late prenatal culture-based screening for GBS colonization or 2) monitoring of women intrapartum for particular risk factors associated with early-onset GBS disease. Evidence that culture-based screening was substantially more effective than the risk-based approach led to revised guidelines in 2002 recommending late prenatal GBS screening for all pregnant women. Although methods for isolation and identification of GBS from prenatal specimens remained the same as those recommended in 1996, the 2002 guidelines recommended that laboratories perform antimicrobial susceptibility testing on prenatal GBS isolates from women at high risk for penicillin anaphylaxis and clarified that laboratories should report the presence of any GBS in urine specimens from pregnant women. To assess laboratory adherence to recommendations in the 2002 guidelines, CDC's Active Bacterial Core surveillance (ABCs)/Emerging Infections Program Network surveyed clinical laboratories about prenatal culture-processing practices in 2003. This report summarizes the results of that survey, which indicated that, although adherence to GBS isolation procedures was high, opportunities exist to improve implementation of recommendations related to antimicrobial susceptibility testing and GBS bacteriuria.
