Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 23, 2026

Differential Effects of Lipid-lowering Drugs in Modulating Morphology of Cholesterol Particles
Published on: November 10, 2017
A pharmacoeconomic evaluation of aggressive cholesterol lowering in Sweden
Anders Olsson1, Roman Casciano, Lee Stern
1Department of Medicine and Care, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Insights
Aggressive atorvastatin treatment after acute coronary syndrome in Sweden reduces events and offsets costs. This approach offers clinical benefits with a significant hospitalization cost reduction.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Health Economics
- Pharmacoeconomics
Background:
- Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) necessitates effective and cost-efficient treatment strategies.
- Statins, like atorvastatin, are crucial in managing cardiovascular risk post-ACS.
- Understanding the economic impact of aggressive statin therapy is vital for healthcare systems.
Purpose of the Study:
- To estimate short-term healthcare costs associated with aggressive atorvastatin treatment in Swedish ACS patients.
- To determine the incremental cost per event avoided with atorvastatin therapy.
- To assess the cost-offset from clinical benefits in a Swedish context.
Main Methods:
- Pharmacoeconomic analysis using data from the MIRACL study and Swedish cost data.
- Comparison of 16-week healthcare costs between atorvastatin 80 mg/day and placebo groups.
- Inclusion of direct medical costs and assessment of various clinical outcomes (e.g., death, MI, stroke, revascularization).
Main Results:
- Atorvastatin reduced the event probability from 40.4% to 36.6% per patient.
- Incremental cost was SEK 578 per patient, with a cost per event avoided of SEK 15,076.
- Sixty-six percent of atorvastatin treatment costs were offset by reduced event-related expenditures.
Conclusions:
- Aggressive short-term atorvastatin treatment post-ACS in Sweden yields significant clinical benefits.
- These clinical benefits lead to a substantial offset in hospitalization costs.
- Atorvastatin therapy demonstrates a favorable pharmacoeconomic profile in the Swedish healthcare setting.
Objective:
To estimate the short-term healthcare costs and incremental cost per event avoided, associated with aggressive atorvastatin treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome in Sweden.
Methods:
The total expected 16-week healthcare costs per patient on atorvastatin 80 mg per day and placebo were compared using clinical outcomes data from The Myocardial Ischemia Reduction with Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering (MIRACL) study and Swedish cost data sources. The incremental cost per event avoided was also assessed for. The clinical outcomes measured in this pharmacoeconomic analysis included: death, cardiac arrest, non-fatal myocardial infarction, fatal myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, non-fatal stroke, congestive heart failure, and surgical or percutaneous coronary revascularizations. All direct medical costs were taken into account.
Results:
The probability of the occurrence of an event was 40.4% per patient in the placebo cohort and 36.6% per patient in the atorvastatin cohort. The total expected cost per patient was SEK 17,887 (1950.21 euro) in the placebo group and SEK 18,465 (2013.06 euro) in the atorvastatin group, resulting in an incremental cost of SEK 578 (63.0137 euro) per patient. The cost per event avoided was SEK 15,076 (1643.64 euro). Sixty six percent of the cost of atorvastatin treatment was offset by the cost savings obtained through the reduction in the number of events in the atorvastatin group compared to the placebo group.
Conclusions:
In Sweden, the clinical benefits of aggressive short-term atorvastatin treatment administered within a few days after acute coronary syndrome is associated with a substantial hospitalization cost offset secondary to the clinical benefits of atorvastatin.
Related Concept Videos
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Lipid-Lowering Drugs: Statins and Miscellaneous Agents
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients