Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Microbial evolution in laboratory environments.

Julian Adams1

  • 1Departments of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, and Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. julian@umich.edu

Research in Microbiology
|June 23, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A multifaceted kinase axis regulates plant organ abscission through conserved signaling mechanisms.

Current biology : CB·2024
Same author

Candidate genes affecting stomatal density in rice (Oryza sativa L.) identified by genome-wide association.

Plant science : an international journal of experimental plant biology·2023
Same author

Targeting CDK9 for treatment of colorectal cancer.

Molecular oncology·2019
Same author

Inhibition of de novo lipogenesis targets androgen receptor signaling in castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2018
Same author

CDKI-73: an orally bioavailable and highly efficacious CDK9 inhibitor against acute myeloid leukemia.

Investigational new drugs·2018
Same author

COEVOLUTION IN BACTERIAL-PLASMID POPULATIONS.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2017
Same journal

Deletion of major shell proteins of ethanolamine utilization microcompartment reduces intrinsic antibiotic resistance, biofilm, and intracellular survival of Salmonella Typhimurium.

Research in microbiology·2025
Same journal

Dynamic exometabolomics reveals metabolic adaptations of Staphylococcus epidermidis to pH-mimicking skin and bloodstream.

Research in microbiology·2025
Same journal

Co-expression network insights into Leptospira interrogans pathogenesis.

Research in microbiology·2025
Same journal

Differential DNA methylation associated with virulence attenuation in Edwardsiella piscicida.

Research in microbiology·2025
Same journal

Klebsiella pneumoniae-induced pneumonia: Pathogenesis, immune interactions, and antimicrobial resistance in a global context.

Research in microbiology·2025
Same journal

Investigating inhibitory effect of sterol targeting compounds against B. anthracis: Membrane microdomain a probable target.

Research in microbiology·2025
See all related articles

New genetic and molecular evidence challenges the classical model of microbial evolution. Evolving laboratory populations reveal unpredictable patterns, offering deeper insights than studies of natural populations.

Area of Science:

  • Microbial Evolution
  • Population Genetics
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • The classical model describes evolutionary change in microbial populations.
  • Recent advances in genetic and molecular analysis offer new tools to study evolution.
  • Laboratory populations provide controlled environments for evolutionary studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the classical model of microbial evolution using modern genetic and molecular data.
  • To identify evolutionary patterns not predicted by the classical model.
  • To emphasize the utility of laboratory populations for detailed evolutionary analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of genetic and molecular data from evolving laboratory microbial populations.
  • Comparison of observed evolutionary patterns with predictions from the classical model.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilizing simple, defined, and homogeneous laboratory environments.

    • Main Results:

    • Observed patterns of evolutionary change deviate from classical model predictions.
    • Genetic and molecular analyses reveal previously unpredicted evolutionary dynamics.
    • Laboratory populations allow for a higher degree of analytical detail compared to natural populations.

    Conclusions:

    • The classical model may not fully capture the complexity of microbial evolution.
    • Evolving laboratory populations are crucial for uncovering novel evolutionary mechanisms.
    • Further research integrating molecular data with laboratory evolution is warranted.