Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The simultaneous acquisition effect: simultaneous task learning inhibits memory for order.

Daniel J Burns1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Union College, Schenectady, NY 12308, USA. Burnsd@union.edu

The American Journal of Psychology
|June 24, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evidence for proactive interference effects in repetitive checking tasks.

Memory (Hove, England)·2025
Same author

Not all checking decreases memory confidence: Implications for obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry·2020
Same author

Dying scenarios improve recall as much as survival scenarios.

Memory (Hove, England)·2013
Same author

Dying to remember, remembering to survive: mortality salience and survival processing.

Memory (Hove, England)·2013
Same author

Adaptive memory: the survival scenario enhances item-specific processing relative to a moving scenario.

Memory (Hove, England)·2012
Same author

Large-scale analysis of high-speed atomic force microscopy data sets using adaptive image processing.

Beilstein journal of nanotechnology·2012
Same journal

Attributing social meaning to animated shapes: A new experimental study of apparent behavior.

The American journal of psychology·2021
Same journal

Scientific Study of Magic: Binet's Pioneering Approach Based on Observations and Chronophotography.

The American journal of psychology·2018
Same journal

Child and Ancient Man: How to Define Their Commonalities and Differences.

The American journal of psychology·2018
Same journal

Adolescent Aggression as Predicted from Parent-Child Relationships and Executive Functions.

The American journal of psychology·2018
Same journal

The Effect of Collective Transitions on the Organization and Contents of Autobiographical Memory: A Transition Theory Perspective.

The American journal of psychology·2018
Same journal

The Development and Validity of a Chinese Version of the Compound Remote Associates Test.

The American journal of psychology·2018
See all related articles

Simultaneous learning of word lists improves delayed recall compared to single-list learning. This simultaneous acquisition effect enhances item memory but not order memory, with exceptions in mixed-list designs.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Memory Research
  • Learning Science

Background:

  • Simultaneous learning of multiple information sets can impact memory recall differently than single-set learning.
  • The item-order distinction is crucial for understanding memory encoding and retrieval processes.
  • Previous research suggests potential benefits of simultaneous acquisition for certain memory aspects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the simultaneous acquisition effect on memory recall, specifically examining the item-order distinction.
  • To test the hypothesis that simultaneous learning enhances item-specific information encoding while impeding order information encoding.
  • To identify boundary conditions for the simultaneous acquisition effect.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a Brown-Peterson-like task to assess delayed word recall.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Employed simultaneous and single-list learning designs across multiple experiments.
  • Manipulated list presentation (simultaneous vs. single) and list type (mixed vs. blocked).

    • Main Results:

    • Simultaneous task learning significantly decreased the encoding of order information compared to single-task learning.
    • No evidence was found supporting the facilitation of item-specific information encoding during simultaneous learning.
    • The simultaneous acquisition effect was absent in a mixed-list design, indicating a boundary condition.

    Conclusions:

    • Simultaneous learning impairs the encoding of order information but does not enhance item-specific information.
    • The benefits of simultaneous acquisition for memory recall are context-dependent, particularly regarding list design.
    • Findings contribute to understanding the mechanisms underlying memory encoding under conditions of divided attention.