Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 4, 2026
Guidelines for Elective Pediatric Fiberoptic Intubation
Published on: January 17, 2011
Implementation of evidence based guidelines for paediatric asthma management in a teaching hospital
J Massie1, D Efron, B Cerritelli
1Department of Respiratory Medicine, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia. john.massie@rch.org.au
Insights
Implementing evidence-based asthma guidelines improved management plans but did not reduce hospital visits or improve child asthma morbidity. Future efforts should target specific care components.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Pulmonology
- Evidence-Based Medicine
- Healthcare Guideline Implementation
Background:
- Asthma is a common chronic respiratory disease in children.
- Effective asthma management guidelines are crucial for improving patient outcomes.
- Systematic approaches to guideline development and implementation require evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the impact of a systematic approach to developing and implementing evidence-based asthma management guidelines.
- To evaluate the effect of these guidelines on pediatric asthma care and outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study involving children aged 2-18 years with acute asthma.
- Three cohorts were analyzed: one control group before guideline implementation and two groups after.
- Data collected included reattendance rates, readmission rates, asthma morbidity measures, and quality of life.
Main Results:
- Guideline implementation significantly increased the provision of asthma management plans.
- No significant differences were observed in reattendance or readmission rates between the cohorts.
- Asthma morbidity and quality of life measures remained comparable across all three cohorts.
Conclusions:
- While evidence-based guidelines improved asthma management plan provision, they did not impact hospital utilization or morbidity.
- Future asthma management strategies should focus on specific, targeted components of care for greater effectiveness.
Aims:
To evaluate a systematic approach to the development and implementation of evidence based asthma management guidelines.
Methods:
Comparative study of children (2-18 years) with acute asthma; a control cohort (cohort 1) was recruited before implementation of the guidelines and two cohorts were recruited after implementation (cohorts 2 and 3).
Results:
There was no difference in the proportion of patients who reattended in the six months following initial presentation for cohort 1 (21.5%), cohort 2 (27.8%), or cohort 3 (25.4%) and no difference in readmission rates (11.4%, 11.3%, 11.0% respectively). There was no difference in measures of asthma morbidity between the cohorts at 3 and 6 months across three domains: interval symptoms, exercise limitation, and bronchodilator use. Of those who did not have a management plan before presentation, one was provided to 46.9% of cohort 1, 74.8% of cohort 2, and 81.1% of cohort 3. There was no difference comparing cohort 2 or cohort 3 with cohort 1 regarding quality of life for either the subjects or their parents.
Conclusions:
Implementation of our evidence based guidelines was associated with the improved provision of asthma management plans, but there was no effect on reattendance or readmission to hospital, asthma morbidity, or quality of life. Future efforts to improve asthma management should target specific components of asthma care.
Related Concept Videos
01:29Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-V: Management
Smoking Cessation
01:30Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-V: Nursing Management
Assessment
01:24Asthma-III: Symptoms and Complications
Classification of Asthma
01:30Asthma-IV: Diagnostic and Management
Clinical Assessment for Asthma:
This is the first step in diagnosing and managing asthma. It includes:
01:30Asthma-IV: Nursing Management
First, in...
01:23Inhaled Medications