Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Research implications of science-informed, value-based decision making.

Jack Dowie1

  • 1Public Health and Policy Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom. Jack.Dowie@lshtm.ac.uk

International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health
|June 24, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The False Dilemma in the Communication of Bad News.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same author

Enhancing Patient Participation in Co-Productive Decision-Making With Personal Value Sets: Clinical Trial Prototype.

Journal of participatory medicine·2026
Same author

Addressing the 'optimal cutoff' Bias in Primary Care Testing.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same author

'Decolonising' the Clinical Encounter via Multi-Criteria Decision Support.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2025
Same author

Focusing on Diagnostic Accuracy Jeopardises Therapeutic Optimality.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2025
Same author

Digitalising Clinical Guidelines: The Challenge of Patient's Preferences.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2024
Same journal

Psychometric validation of the Spanish SDM-20: an occupational health screening tool for assessing workplace mobbing.

International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health·2026
Same journal

Social functioning as a domain of quality of life in adults with obesity: results of the phase 2 validation of the <i>Obesity Quality of Life Instrument</i>.

International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health·2026
Same journal

Bacteria and associated antibiotic resistance in air filter-derived biological material from utility vehicles at mechanical-biological treatment plants.

International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health·2026
Same journal

Tracking risk-taking behind the wheel: Which indicator of risky driving is the most useful in driving simulator studies? A pilot study.

International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health·2026
Same journal

Aspects of young employees' mental health: a narrative review.

International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health·2026
Same journal

Differences in work satisfaction among remote, hybrid, and on-site workers: the role of core self-evaluations and fulfilment of basic psychological needs.

International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health·2026
See all related articles

Scientists must embrace uncertainty, acting as

Area of Science:

  • Decision analysis
  • Bayesian inference
  • Scientific methodology

Background:

  • Classical inferential methods in science prioritize certainty but fail to meet decision-makers' needs for timely, integrated information.
  • Public decision-making under uncertainty and value conflict requires transparent accountability.
  • Current scientific practices often do not adequately support value-based decision-making processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To advocate for a shift in the scientific role from 'guardians of certainty' to 'guardians of uncertainty'.
  • To highlight the necessity of Bayesian decision analysis for integrating scientific knowledge into public policy.
  • To differentiate between various decision-making approaches based on their focus, cognitive modes, and underlying value judgments.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Distinguishing actors and technologies based on focus (knowledge, values, choice).
  • Analyzing the cognitive continuum of analysis-to-intuition ratios in decision-making.
  • Examining underlying value judgments, including error loss functions and time discount rates.

Main Results:

  • Classical methods are insufficient for timely and integrated decision support.
  • Stochastic Bayesian decision analysis offers analytical coherence for public decision-making.
  • Scientific researchers must provide best-estimate posterior distributions for decision-makers.

Conclusions:

  • Scientists should act as 'guardians of uncertainty', providing probabilistic outputs for decision-making.
  • Bayesian decision analysis is crucial for transparent and accountable public decision-making.
  • Decision-making principles beyond the 'Best Principle' reflect specific value judgments and advocacy.