Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Reference-frame misalignment and cardinal direction judgments: group differences and strategies.

Leo Gugerty1, Johnell Brooks

  • 1Psychology Department, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA. gugeny@clemson.edu

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied
|June 30, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Biased belief updating in causal reasoning about COVID-19.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2022
Same author

Individual differences in strategy use and performance during fault diagnosis.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2020
Same author

How heuristic credibility cues affect credibility judgments and decisions.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2020
Same author

Interactive Tools for Measuring Visual Scanning Performance and Reaction Time.

The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association·2017
Same author

Training the Motor Aspects of Pre-driving Skills of Young Adults With and Without Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders·2016
Same author

Effects of intelligent advanced warnings on drivers negotiating the dilemma zone.

Human factors·2014
Same journal

Configurational antecedents of employee green behavior: A mixed methods study.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
Same journal

The effects of counterfactual thinking on unilateral forgiveness: Can victims do it on their own?

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
Same journal

Gray swan neglect: Do forecasters account for low(ish) probability events?

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
Same journal

An inductive learning intervention to improve news veracity discernment.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
Same journal

Forgetting and blame: When cognitive lapses excuse and when they backfire.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
Same journal

Predecisional distortion of risk information seen in icon arrays.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
See all related articles

Navigational reference frame misalignment significantly impairs cardinal direction judgments. While experience reduces this effect, even experts show performance declines when frames are misaligned, impacting navigation training.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Navigation
  • Spatial Cognition

Background:

  • Egocentric and exocentric reference frames are crucial for human navigation.
  • Misalignment between these frames can disrupt spatial orientation and wayfinding.
  • Understanding these disruptions is key to improving navigational skills.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of egocentric and exocentric reference frame misalignment on cardinal direction judgments.
  • To quantify performance decrements in accuracy and speed due to reference frame conflicts.
  • To explore how experience and individual strategies mitigate or exacerbate these effects.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments involving cardinal direction judgment tasks were conducted.
  • Participants included less experienced and experienced navigators, as well as college students.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Experiment 3 specifically analyzed subtasks of a common navigational strategy to isolate reference frame effects.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant performance decrements in accuracy and speed were observed when reference frames were misaligned.
    • The magnitude of these decrements decreased with increased navigational ability and experience.
    • Even experienced navigators exhibited performance declines under reference frame misalignment.

    Conclusions:

    • Reference frame misalignment poses a substantial challenge to accurate cardinal direction judgments.
    • Navigational training and interface design should consider and address potential reference frame conflicts.
    • Further research into specific navigational strategies can optimize training protocols.