Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluation of hypothesis testing for comparing two populations using NONMEM analysis.

D B White1, C A Walawander, D Y Liu

  • 1Department of Statistics, State University of New York, Buffalo 14214.

Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics
|June 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Clinical characteristics and genotype analysis of two rare subtypes of acute myeloid leukemia].

Zhonghua yi xue za zhi·2025
Same author

[Analysis on psychosocial factors for early puberty in children].

Zhonghua liu xing bing xue za zhi = Zhonghua liuxingbingxue zazhi·2025
Same author

[Characteristics and diagnostic value of serum bile acids profile in pregnant women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and asymptomatic hypercholanemia of pregnancy].

Zhonghua fu chan ke za zhi·2024
Same author

[Analysis of related factors influencing the detection rate of mosaic embryo and the pregnancy outcomes with mosaic embryo transfers].

Zhonghua fu chan ke za zhi·2024
Same author

[Safety of double and a half layered esophagojejunal anastomosis in radical gastrectomy: A prospective, multi-center, single arm trial].

Zhonghua wei chang wai ke za zhi = Chinese journal of gastrointestinal surgery·2023
Same author

[Analysis of characteristics of types of primary sexual partners and related factors of not being tested for HIV among men who have sex with men].

Zhonghua liu xing bing xue za zhi = Zhonghua liuxingbingxue zazhi·2023
Same journal

Integrated equation to evaluate accumulation profiles of drugs eliminated by Michaelis-Menten kinetics.

Journal of pharmacokinetics and biopharmaceutics·2010
Same journal

Applications of a recirculatory stochastic pharmacokinetic model: limitations of compartmental models.

Journal of pharmacokinetics and biopharmaceutics·2010
Same journal

Effect of plasma protein and tissue binding on the time course of drug concentration in plasma.

Journal of pharmacokinetics and biopharmaceutics·2010
Same journal

Pharmacokinetics of methotrexate in solid tumors.

Journal of pharmacokinetics and biopharmaceutics·2010
Same journal

Single- and multiple-dose kinetics of oral lorazepam in humans: the predictability of accumulation.

Journal of pharmacokinetics and biopharmaceutics·2010
Same journal

Comparison of the in vitro and in vivo release of digoxin from four different soft gelatin capsule formulations.

Journal of pharmacokinetics and biopharmaceutics·2010
See all related articles

NONMEM software effectively detects population differences using confidence interval and likelihood ratio tests. The likelihood ratio test is superior for sparse data when comparing standard deviations.

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacometrics
  • Statistical Inference
  • Population Pharmacokinetics

Background:

  • Evaluating population pharmacokinetic parameters is crucial for drug development.
  • NONMEM is a widely used software for population pharmacokinetic analysis.
  • Comparing two populations requires robust hypothesis testing methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of two hypothesis testing methods in NONMEM for population pharmacokinetic parameters.
  • To evaluate power and Type I error rates for confidence interval (CI) tests and likelihood ratio (LR) tests.
  • To assess the effectiveness of these tests in detecting clinically significant differences between populations.

Main Methods:

  • Simulation study using a monoexponential pharmacokinetic model.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Generation of power curves for ratios of mean clearance and population standard deviations of clearance.
  • Comparison of 95% confidence interval tests and likelihood ratio tests within NONMEM.
  • Analysis of parameter estimation results to understand test power.

    • Main Results:

    • For comparing means, CI tests and LR tests showed similar power, with CI tests being more accurate regarding significance levels.
    • For comparing standard deviations, the LR test demonstrated higher power, especially with limited data.
    • Non-normality of standard deviation ratio estimates impacted the power of CI tests.

    Conclusions:

    • NONMEM's significance tests are effective for detecting clinically relevant population differences.
    • The LR test is advantageous for comparing standard deviations, particularly with sparse data.
    • CI tests are reliable for comparing means, maintaining accurate significance levels.