Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparing questionnaire-based methods to assess occupational silica exposure.

Christine G Parks1, Glinda S Cooper, Leena A Nylander-French

  • 1Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA. Cqp8@cdc.gov

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)
|July 3, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Challenges and pitfalls in analyzing, reporting, and interpreting health effects related to occupational and environmental exposures.

Frontiers in epidemiology·2026
Same author

Updating our quantification of non-occupational pesticide exposure in agricultural settings: A revised algorithm for the Agricultural Health Study.

Environmental advances·2026
Same author

Heat stress in relation to sleep health among farmers: a cross-sectional study.

BMC public health·2026
Same author

Serum per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) concentrations and anti-spike SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels following COVID-19 vaccination: A cross-sectional study in three communities with elevated PFAS exposure.

International journal of hygiene and environmental health·2026
Same author

Editorial: Risk and protective factors in the natural history of autoimmunity.

Frontiers in immunology·2026
Same author

Pesticides associated with incident diabetes among licensed private pesticide applicators in the Agricultural Health Study cohort (1993-2021).

Environment international·2026

Accurate occupational silica exposure assessment requires detailed task-based questions, not just job titles. Standardized codes underestimate exposure risks, particularly for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in women.

Area of Science:

  • Occupational health
  • Epidemiology
  • Environmental health

Background:

  • Traditional occupational silica exposure assessment focuses on long-term work in dusty trades, often overlooking jobs held by women.
  • A case-control study investigated alternative questionnaire methods for assessing silica exposure in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effectiveness of different questionnaire-based methods in assessing occupational silica exposure.
  • To evaluate the limitations of standardized coding systems versus detailed task-based assessments.

Main Methods:

  • Employed in-person interviews with job histories (≥12 months) and checklists of silica-related tasks (≥2 weeks).
  • Industrial hygienists reviewed job descriptions, with potential exposures confirmed via follow-up interviews.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Compared a full assessment with a standardized code groups index.

    • Main Results:

    • The full assessment identified medium/high silica exposure in 9% of SLE cases and 4% of controls (OR=2.9).
    • Standardized codes identified only 4% of cases and 9% of controls with silica exposure (OR=0.4), significantly underestimating risk.
    • Task-based assessment revealed a higher prevalence of silica exposure among SLE cases.

    Conclusions:

    • Task-specific questions are crucial for a comprehensive assessment of occupational silica exposure.
    • Standardized code groups are insufficient for accurately defining silica exposure or selecting jobs for expert review.
    • Methodological choices significantly impact the estimation of silica exposure and associated disease risks.