Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Reasoning from inconsistency to consistency.

P N Johnson-Laird1, Vittorio Girotto, Paolo Legrenzi

  • 1Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA. phil@princeton.edu

Psychological Review
|July 15, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mistakes in Thinking about Cognitive Science and How to Reduce Them.

eNeuro·2024
Same author

Reasoning From Quantified Modal Premises.

Cognitive science·2024
Same author

Reasoning about possibilities: Modal logics, possible worlds, and mental models.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2024
Same author

Recursion in programs, thought, and language.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2021
Same author

Reasoning about properties: A computational theory.

Psychological review·2021
Same author

The probability of conditionals: A review.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2021
Same journal

Why the Big Five personality traits are composites, not common causes: Implications for measurement, prediction, and causal inference.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

Perception and action as one: Re-integrating research on human action through event files.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

Associative learning explains "intuitive statistics" in animals.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

A reciprocal model of practice and skill: Navigating between dropout and expertise.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

The relative psychometric function: A general analysis framework for relating psychological processes.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

A taxonomy of discriminatory behavior.

Psychological review·2026
See all related articles

This study explains how people resolve inconsistencies by building mental models and causal explanations. Experimental results support this theory of reasoning from inconsistency to consistency.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Reasoning and Decision Making

Background:

  • Understanding how individuals process and resolve conflicting information is crucial in cognitive psychology.
  • Existing theories offer limited explanations for the dynamic process of moving from inconsistency to consistency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a novel theory explaining how individuals reason from inconsistency to consistency.
  • To outline the core principles of this theory and its computational implementation.

Main Methods:

  • The theory is based on three principles: constructing mental models, retracting propositions upon detecting inconsistency, and using causal knowledge for explanation.
  • A computer program was developed to implement the proposed theory.
  • Experimental studies were conducted to validate the theory's principles.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Experimental findings provide support for each of the three core principles of the theory.
  • The computational model successfully simulates human reasoning from inconsistency to consistency.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed theory offers a coherent framework for understanding inconsistency resolution in human reasoning.
  • The integration of mental models and causal explanations is key to resolving cognitive inconsistencies.