Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Contemporary skull base reconstruction.

Jeffrey S Moyer1, Douglas B Chepeha, Theodoros N Teknos

  • 1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0312, USA.

Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery
|July 15, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Speech and swallowing outcome measures for oral cancer - what should we be collecting?

Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery·2026
Same author

Total Laryngectomy Length of Stay Association With Diagnosis Related Group Classification.

The Laryngoscope·2025
Same author

JawLink: An In-Ear Optical Interface for Orofacial Movement Monitoring and Speech Detection.

IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society·2025
Same author

Pancancer outcome prediction via a unified weakly supervised deep learning model.

Signal transduction and targeted therapy·2025
Same author

Retraction Note: Tetrathiomolybdate inhibits head and neck cancer metastasis by decreasing tumor cell motility, invasiveness and by promoting tumor cell anoikis.

Molecular cancer·2025
Same author

In-Ear System for Monitoring Lower Jaw Motion: A Novel Approach to Speech Intention Detection in Laryngectomy Patients.

IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering·2025
Same journal

Photon-counting detector computed tomography for temporal bone: does higher resolution matter?

Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery·2026
Same journal

Advances in patient-specific 3D-printed models in temporal bone surgery.

Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery·2026
Same journal

Graduated autonomy in head and neck microvascular surgery fellowship training: oncologic and reconstructive competency, safety, and educational implications.

Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery·2026
Same journal

Costs and system-wide considerations within head and neck reconstruction: moving toward a value-based care framework.

Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery·2026
Same journal

Modern methods of dorsal augmentation rhinoplasty.

Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery·2026
Same journal

Flap selection for circumferential pharyngeal reconstruction.

Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery·2026
See all related articles

Advancements in reconstructive techniques, including vascularized tissue, have improved outcomes for skull base surgery. Free tissue transfer and local flaps are now preferred for skull base defect repair, reducing complications.

Area of Science:

  • Neurosurgery
  • Plastic Surgery
  • Reconstructive Surgery

Background:

  • Skull base surgery has evolved significantly due to reconstructive technique advancements.
  • Historically, high mortality rates were associated with skull base repair before vascularized tissue use.
  • Early reconstructive efforts included local flaps (1960s) and regional flaps (1970s-80s), improving but still yielding high complication rates.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the evolution and current applications of reconstructive techniques in skull base surgery.
  • To highlight the impact of vascularized tissue on improving surgical outcomes and reducing complications.
  • To compare the efficacy of local flaps, regional flaps, and free tissue transfer in skull base defect reconstruction.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of historical and contemporary literature on skull base reconstruction.
  • Analysis of the development and application of local, regional, and free tissue flap techniques.
  • Evaluation of complication rates and outcomes associated with different reconstructive methods.

    • Main Results:

    • Free tissue transfer has become a reliable method for separating intracranial and extracranial environments, addressing large defects.
    • Free tissue transfer provides dependable, vascularized tissue resistant to adjuvant radiation.
    • Local flaps are valuable adjuncts to free tissue transfer and can suffice in select cases.

    Conclusions:

    • Vascularized tissue use has significantly improved the prevention of complications in skull base surgery.
    • Free tissue transfer and/or local flap reconstruction are preferred based on defect characteristics and anatomical site.
    • Regional flap reconstruction is best reserved for situations where other techniques are unavailable.