Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Diagnostic imaging for back pain.

Michael Yelland1

  • 1Centre for General Practice, University of Queensland. myelland@bigpond.com

Australian Family Physician
|July 16, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

X-rays and CT scans do not improve outcomes for back pain. While imaging can help exclude serious conditions, most findings are unrelated to pain, and clinical history is key for accurate diagnosis.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Best practice care for acute low back pain: A new clinical standard to assist general practitioners.

Australian journal of general practice·2024
Same author

Prolotherapy injections and physiotherapy used singly and in combination for lateral epicondylalgia: a single-blinded randomised clinical trial.

BMC musculoskeletal disorders·2019
Same author

Relationship between ultrasound detected tendon abnormalities, and sensory and clinical characteristics in people with chronic lateral epicondylalgia.

PloS one·2018
Same author

Management of Whiplash Associated Disorders in Australian general practice.

BMC musculoskeletal disorders·2017
Same author

Review: Pregabalin reduces fibromyalgia pain but increases adverse events.

Annals of internal medicine·2017
Same author

Low-level laser therapy for chronic non-specific low back pain: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Acupuncture in medicine : journal of the British Medical Acupuncture Society·2016
Same journal

Occupational violence and staff safety in general practice.

Australian family physician·2018
Same journal

You should get that mole checked out: Ethical and legal considerations of the unsolicited clinical opinion.

Australian family physician·2018
Same journal

Understanding the decision to commence a dose administration aid.

Australian family physician·2018
Same journal

Psychological distress and risky sexual behaviours among women aged 16-25 years in Victoria, Australia.

Australian family physician·2018
Same journal

A mixed-methods feasibility study of routinely weighing patients in general practice to aid weight management.

Australian family physician·2018
Same journal

The Australian Mid-West Coastal Marine Wound Infections Study.

Australian family physician·2018
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Diagnostic Imaging
  • Clinical Medicine

Background:

  • Diagnostic imaging, including X-rays and CT scans, is frequently used for back pain to rule out pathology, establish diagnoses, and meet patient expectations.
  • The utility and accuracy of these imaging modalities in the context of back pain management are subjects of ongoing clinical review.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the existing evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of imaging for back pain.
  • To guide the rational ordering of imaging tests without negatively impacting patient satisfaction.

Main Methods:

  • Evidence review of diagnostic accuracy studies for X-rays and CT scans in back pain.
  • Analysis of the association between radiological findings and clinical outcomes.
  • Assessment of the role of clinical history in identifying patients who require imaging.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • X-rays do not demonstrate a significant impact on outcomes or disability associated with back pain.
  • The accuracy of both X-rays and CT scans in excluding serious causes of back pain is limited.
  • A substantial proportion of positive findings on radiological investigations, especially degenerative changes, show minimal to no correlation with the presence of back pain.

Conclusions:

  • Clinical history, focusing on key indicators of serious conditions, is crucial for identifying patients who genuinely need imaging.
  • Radiological investigations have limited accuracy for diagnosing the cause of most back pain.
  • Effective communication with patients regarding imaging results is essential to alleviate concerns about serious pathology and contextualize incidental findings.