Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A comparison of facial grading systems.

I M Smith1, J A Murray, R E Cull

  • 1Department of Otolaryngology, Bristol Royal Infirmary, U.K.

Clinical Otolaryngology and Allied Sciences
|August 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A pilot evaluation of the Baby Social ABCs caregiver-mediated intervention for 6-15-month-olds with early signs of autism-feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary evidence.

Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry·2025
Same author

A longitudinal comparison of emotional, behavioral and attention problems in autistic and typically developing children.

Psychological medicine·2023
Same author

Non-verbal IQ and change in restricted and repetitive behavior throughout childhood in autism: a longitudinal study using the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised.

Molecular autism·2021
Same author

An artificial intelligence deep learning model for identification of small bowel obstruction on plain abdominal radiographs.

The British journal of radiology·2021
Same author

Plastic physicians: The surgical salamanders of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS·2020
Same author

Predictive impact of rare genomic copy number variations in siblings of individuals with autism spectrum disorders.

Nature communications·2019
Same journal

Correspondence.

Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences·2017
Same journal

Erratum.

Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences·2013
Same journal

Compact training course in ear surgery erlangen, Germany, 26-28 february 1998.

Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences·2013
Same journal

How we do it: a practical approach to Foley catheter posterior nasal packing.

Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences·2004
Same journal

How we do it: management of tracheobronchial foreign bodies in children.

Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences·2004
Same journal

Is cochlear outer hair cell function affected by mobile telephone radiation?

Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences·2004
See all related articles

Facial palsy grading systems show comparable validity and consistency. The simplest, House-Brackman system, is recommended due to interobserver variation impacting results, not observer experience.

Area of Science:

  • Otolaryngology
  • Neurology
  • Plastic Surgery

Background:

  • Facial palsy severity estimation requires reliable grading systems.
  • Multiple classification systems exist, but their comparative performance is unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the validity and consistency of leading facial palsy grading systems.
  • To identify the most reliable and practical system for clinical use.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of established facial palsy grading systems.
  • Assessment of interobserver and intraobserver reliability.
  • Evaluation of system validity and consistency.

Main Results:

  • All leading facial palsy grading systems demonstrated comparable validity and consistency.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Interobserver variation significantly impacted system consistency.
  • Observer experience did not significantly influence grading consistency.

    • Conclusions:

    • No single grading system offers a distinct advantage over others in terms of validity and consistency.
    • The House-Brackman system is recommended due to its simplicity and comparable performance.
    • Standardization of grading protocols is crucial to minimize interobserver variability.