Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 23, 2026

Detection of Antibodies That Neutralize the Cellular Uptake of Enzyme Replacement Therapies with a Cell-based Assay
Published on: September 10, 2018
Impact of neutralizing antibodies on the clinical efficacy of interferon beta in multiple sclerosis
Timothy Vartanian1, Per Sölberg Sørensen, George Rice
1Beth Israel-Deaconess, Harvard Institute of Medicine, Boston, MA 02115, USA. TVartani@bidmc.harvard.edu
Neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) can develop in a large proportion of patients with MS who receive treatment with interferon beta (IFNbeta). Data show that IFNbeta-1b is more immunogenic than IFNbeta-1a and that IFNbeta-1a-Rebif((R)) is more immunogenic than IFNbeta-1a-Avonex((R)). This article reviews the long-term data from large phase III clinical trials showing that NAbs can reduce the clinical efficacy of IFNbeta in patients with MS; patients who have a positive result on NAb testing have a higher relapse rate and more disease activity, as measured by brain MRI, than do patients with a negative result. The detrimental effects of NAbs were not observed until after 18 months of treatment, suggesting that short-term clinical trials cannot adequately assess the efficacy of IFNbeta products in MS. Clinicians should consider the possible development of NAbs when starting patients on treatment and in patients with disease progression while on IFNbeta treatment.
Neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) can develop in a large proportion of patients with MS who receive treatment with interferon beta (IFNbeta). Data show that IFNbeta-1b is more immunogenic than IFNbeta-1a and that IFNbeta-1a-Rebif((R)) is more immunogenic than IFNbeta-1a-Avonex((R)). This article reviews the long-term data from large phase III clinical trials showing that NAbs can reduce the clinical efficacy of IFNbeta in patients with MS; patients who have a positive result on NAb testing have a higher relapse rate and more disease activity, as measured by brain MRI, than do patients with a negative result. The detrimental effects of NAbs were not observed until after 18 months of treatment, suggesting that short-term clinical trials cannot adequately assess the efficacy of IFNbeta products in MS. Clinicians should consider the possible development of NAbs when starting patients on treatment and in patients with disease progression while on IFNbeta treatment.
More Related Videos
09:38Determining Immune System Suppression versus CNS Protection for Pharmacological Interventions in Autoimmune Demyelination
Published on: September 12, 2016
12:09Measuring Influenza Neutralizing Antibody Responses to A(H3N2) Viruses in Human Sera by Microneutralization Assays Using MDCK-SIAT1 Cells
Published on: November 22, 2017