Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 23, 2026

An In vitro System to Gauge the Thrombolytic Efficacy of Histotripsy and a Lytic Drug
Published on: June 4, 2021
Low molecular weight heparins: the optimal treatment for venous thromboembolism
Marios E Daskalopoulos1, Stella S Daskalopoulou, Christos D Liapis
1Second Department of Propedeutic Surgery, Athens University Medical School, Laiko Hospital, Athens, Greece. mdaskalopoulos@hotmail.com
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common vascular complication that requires immediate as well as long-term treatment. Unfractionated heparin (UFH), followed by oral anticoagulants (OAs), is of proved efficacy in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). However, low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) have successfully replaced UFH both in the prevention and in the initial treatment of DVT and PE. Recent trials evaluated the efficacy and safety of LMWH therapy as an alternative to vitamin K antagonists in long-term VTE secondary prophylaxis for all patients and in specific subgroups. LMWHs differ considerably from each other. These agents were studied separately, administered according to various protocols, in various doses and for different duration of treatment. Results from prospective randomized trials, conducted during the last decade, indicate that LMWHs are at least as effective and yet safer than OAs in the long-term treatment of VTE. In this brief overview, we consider the potential advantages of treatment with LMWH in patients with VTE.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common vascular complication that requires immediate as well as long-term treatment. Unfractionated heparin (UFH), followed by oral anticoagulants (OAs), is of proved efficacy in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). However, low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) have successfully replaced UFH both in the prevention and in the initial treatment of DVT and PE. Recent trials evaluated the efficacy and safety of LMWH therapy as an alternative to vitamin K antagonists in long-term VTE secondary prophylaxis for all patients and in specific subgroups. LMWHs differ considerably from each other. These agents were studied separately, administered according to various protocols, in various doses and for different duration of treatment. Results from prospective randomized trials, conducted during the last decade, indicate that LMWHs are at least as effective and yet safer than OAs in the long-term treatment of VTE. In this brief overview, we consider the potential advantages of treatment with LMWH in patients with VTE.
Related Concept Videos
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management
Venous Thrombosis I: Introduction
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies