Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Failure of motor learning for large initial errors.

Terence D Sanger1

  • 1Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-5235, USA. sanger@stanford.edu

Neural Computation
|July 22, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effect of EMG-activated vibrotactile biofeedback on skill learning in children with genetic and acquired dystonia during point-to-point and cyclic task practice.

Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation·2025
Same author

Frequency-dependent modulation of evoked potentials during GPi-DBS in pediatric dystonia.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Local field potential signal transmission is correlated with the fractional anisotropy measured by diffusion tractography.

Brain communications·2025
Same author

Transformer Models for Signal Processing: Scaled Dot-Product Attention Implements Constrained Filtering.

Neural computation·2025
Same author

Deep brain stimulation in globus pallidus internus travels to thalamus and subthalamic nuclei along physiological pathways.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2025
Same author

Effect of EMG-activated vibrotactile biofeedback on skill learning in children with genetic and acquired dystonia during practice of a point-to-point and a cyclic task.

Research square·2025
Same journal

A Model-Free Reinforcement Learning Implementation of Decision Making Under Uncertainty by Sequential Sampling.

Neural computation·2026
Same journal

DROP: Distributional and Regular Optimism and Pessimism for Reinforcement Learning.

Neural computation·2026
Same journal

Hierarchical Active Inference Using Successor Representations.

Neural computation·2026
Same journal

W-Kernel and Its Principal Space for Frequentist Evaluation of Bayesian Estimators.

Neural computation·2026
Same journal

A Hidden Markov Model-Inspired Sequence Classification Method for Hyperdimensional Computing.

Neural computation·2026
Same journal

Sparse Graphical Modeling for Electrophysiological Phase-Based Connectivity Using Circular Statistics.

Neural computation·2026
See all related articles

Motor learning can fail even with practice, especially for complex tasks without prior knowledge. This study identifies two computational failure modes where further training examples do not improve performance, explaining persistent skill plateaus.

Area of Science:

  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Motor Control
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Humans often fail to improve complex motor skills despite extensive practice.
  • Existing motor learning models do not fully explain these persistent performance plateaus.
  • Learning is challenging without prior system knowledge or exhaustive exploration of control strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the computational basis for motor learning failure in complex tasks.
  • To identify conditions under which motor learning fails despite continuous practice.
  • To provide a mathematical model for the observed lack of improvement in human motor skills.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a computational model of a controller using a linear combination of nonlinear basis functions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Employed a gradient descent learning rule trained on observed commands and their outcomes.
  • Analyzed the model to identify conditions leading to failure modes in motor learning.

    • Main Results:

    • Derived the mathematical conditions for motor learning failure.
    • Identified two specific failure modes where performance improvement ceases.
    • Demonstrated that continued training examples are ineffective in these failure modes.

    Conclusions:

    • The derived computational model explains why motor learning can stall.
    • These findings offer a potential explanation for the lack of skill improvement in humans.
    • Suggests that understanding these failure modes is crucial for developing effective motor learning strategies.