[Fuzzy logic in urology. How to reason in inaccurate terms]

The Occidental thinking is basically binary, based on opposites. The classic logic constitutes a systematization of these thinking. The methods of pure sciences such as physics are based on systematic measurement, analysis and synthesis. Nature is described by deterministic differential equations this way. Medical knowledge does not adjust well to deterministic equations of physics so that probability methods are employed. However, this method is not free of problems, both theoretical and practical, so that it is not often possible even to know with certainty the probabilities of most events. On the other hand, the application of binary logic to medicine in general, and to urology particularly, finds serious difficulties such as the imprecise character of the definition of most diseases and the uncertainty associated with most medical acts. These are responsible for the fact that many medical recommendations are made using a literary language which is inaccurate, inconsistent and incoherent. The blurred logic is a way of reasoning coherently using inaccurate concepts. This logic was proposed by Lofti Zadeh in 1965 and it is based in two principles: the theory of blurred conjuncts and the use of blurred rules. A blurred conjunct is one the elements of which have a degree of belonging between 0 and 1. Each blurred conjunct is associated with an inaccurate property or linguistic variable. Blurred rules use the principles of classic logic adapted to blurred conjuncts taking the degree of belonging of each element to the blurred conjunct of reference as the value of truth. Blurred logic allows to do coherent urologic recommendations (i.e. what patient is the performance of PSA indicated in?, what to do in the face of an elevated PSA?), or to perform diagnosis adapted to the uncertainty of diagnostic tests (e.g. data obtained from pressure flow studies in females).