Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Guardianship and consent.

J A Devereux

    Medicine and Law
    |July 24, 2004
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Healthcare consent is crucial, but many lack decision-making capacity. This paper explores substitute decision-making, emphasizing beneficence and the challenge of defining competency for patient autonomy.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Futile treatment - when is enough, enough?

    Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association·2024
    Same author

    Legal imperatives in treating severe stroke.

    International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society·2016
    Same author

    Road not taken: lessons to be learned from Queen v. Gillett.

    Internal medicine journal·2007
    Same author

    Can children withhold consent to treatment?

    BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·1993
    Same journal

    CRIMINAL CONDUCT DUE TO DRUNKENNESS: CRITICAL EVALUATION OF BRAZILIAN TRAFFIC LEGISLATION.

    Medicine and law·2019
    Same journal

    TRANSDISCIPLINARITY IN STRATEGIC DECISIONS FOR ONCOLOGICAL TREATMENTS.

    Medicine and law·2019
    Same journal

    LAWS RELATED TO THE PROTECTION OF WOMEN'S HEALTH IN JAPAN.

    Medicine and law·2019
    Same journal

    ANTICIPATED DIRECTIVES OF WILL, ADVANCE HEALTH CARE DIRECTIVE, HEALTH CARE ATTORNEY: AN ISSUE OF SELF-DETERMINATION.

    Medicine and law·2019
    Same journal

    HEALTH LAW AND ELDERLY PERSONS.

    Medicine and law·2019
    Same journal

    IS A 'NO FAULT' COMPENSATION SCHEME THE ANSWER TO THE PROBLEMS OF TORT IN CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE?

    Medicine and law·2019
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Bioethics
    • Healthcare Law
    • Medical Ethics

    Background:

    • Patient consent is a cornerstone of modern healthcare.
    • Individuals lacking decision-making capacity pose ethical and legal challenges.
    • Autonomy in healthcare requires the ability to make informed choices.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To examine the legal and ethical frameworks for substitute decision-making in healthcare.
    • To explore the implications of diminished autonomy for patient care.
    • To highlight the principle of beneficence in ensuring necessary treatment for incapacitated individuals.

    Main Methods:

    • Legal and ethical analysis of substitute decision-making.
    • Review of bioethical principles, including autonomy and beneficence.
    Keywords:
    Legal ApproachProfessional Patient Relationship

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of legal mechanisms like Guardianship tribunals.

    • Main Results:

    • An increasing number of individuals cannot exercise autonomy in healthcare decisions.
    • The principle of beneficence allows for necessary treatment when autonomous consent is absent.
    • Guardianship tribunals exemplify the application of beneficence.

    Conclusions:

    • Substitute decision-making is essential for patients lacking capacity.
    • Beneficence ensures treatment access for vulnerable populations.
    • Defining competency remains a significant challenge in healthcare law and ethics.