Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 10, 2026

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test (MSPT): An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool
Published on: June 30, 2014
Improving the quality of outpatient clinic letters using the Sheffield Assessment Instrument for Letters (SAIL)
Adam T Fox1, Roger D Palmer, James G M Crossley
1Luton and Dunstable Hospital NHS Trust, Luton, UK. adam.fox@btinternet.com
Insights
Improving outpatient letters significantly enhances communication between hospital and primary care doctors. The Sheffield Assessment Instrument for Letters (SAIL) tool demonstrated a powerful educational impact, aiding clinical governance.
Area of Science:
- Medical Communication
- Health Services Research
- Quality Improvement in Healthcare
Background:
- Effective communication between hospital specialists and primary care physicians is crucial for patient care continuity.
- Outpatient letters are a primary method for this communication, but their quality can vary.
- Existing methods for assessing letter quality may lack reliability or feasibility.
Purpose of the Study:
- To enhance the quality of outpatient letters used for interprofessional communication.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of the Sheffield Assessment Instrument for Letters (SAIL) as a quality improvement tool.
- To assess the educational impact of feedback derived from the SAIL tool.
Main Methods:
- A single-centre study conducted in a general pediatric outpatient department.
- Seven hospital practitioners each provided 15 outpatient letters on two separate occasions.
- Letters were assessed using the Sheffield Assessment Instrument for Letters (SAIL) by hospital doctors and general practitioners (GPs), with individualized feedback provided after the first assessment.
Main Results:
- A statistically significant improvement in the mean quality scores of outpatient letters was observed (P = 0.001).
- The mean quality score increased from 23.3 to 26.6 after the intervention.
- All participating doctors completed the audit cycle, indicating feasibility and engagement.
Conclusions:
- The Sheffield Assessment Instrument for Letters (SAIL) is a feasible and reliable tool for assessing outpatient letter quality.
- The study demonstrates the significant educational impact of feedback provided through the SAIL tool.
- This approach shows potential for medical appraisal and revalidation, supporting clinical governance requirements for quality improvement.
Aim:
To improve the quality of outpatient letters used as communication between hospital and primary care doctors.
Methods:
On 2 separate occasions, 15 unselected outpatient letters written by each of 7 hospital practitioners were rated by another hospital doctor and a general practitioner (GP) using the Sheffield Assessment Instrument for Letters (SAIL). Individualised feedback was provided to participants following the rating of the first set of letters. The audit cycle was completed 3 months later without forewarning by repeat assessment by the same hospital and GP assessors using the SAIL tool to see if there was any improvement in correspondence.
Setting:
Single centre: general paediatric outpatient department in a large district general hospital.
Results:
All 7 doctors available for reassessment completed the audit loop, each providing 15 outpatient letters per assessment. The mean of the quality scores, derived for each letter from the summation of a 20-point checklist and a global score, improved from 23.3 (95% CI 22.1-24.4) to 26.6 (95% CI 25.8-27.4) (P = 0.001).
Conclusions:
The SAIL provides a feasible and reliable method of assessing the quality and content of outpatient clinic letters. This study demonstrates that it can also provide feedback with a powerful educational impact. This approach holds real potential for appraisal and revalidation, providing an effective means for the quality improvement required by clinical governance.
More Related Videos
05:56Implementation of Non-invasive Point of Care Transient Elastography for Evaluation of Liver Disease in Pediatric Populations with Cystic Fibrosis
Published on: August 29, 2025
10:39Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
Related Concept Videos
SBAR I: Understanding the Concept
Standardized methods of communication have been developed to ensure that information is...
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Health Literacy
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
Flow Sheet
Here's a closer look at the examples of flowsheets commonly used by nurses:
Graphic Sheet Documentation: