Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 23, 2026

Echocardiographic Approaches and Protocols for Comprehensive Phenotypic Characterization of Valvular Heart Disease in Mice
Published on: February 14, 2017
Differentiation of constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy using mitral annular velocity by tissue
Jong-Won Ha1, Steve R Ommen, A Jamil Tajik
1Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Insights
Early diastolic mitral annular velocity (E') measured by tissue Doppler echocardiography effectively distinguishes constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathies. A specific E' cut-off value offers high accuracy for diagnosing these heart conditions.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Diagnostic Imaging
- Echocardiography
Background:
- Differentiating constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy is clinically challenging.
- Both conditions can present with similar diastolic heart failure symptoms.
- Accurate diagnosis is crucial for appropriate treatment and patient management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic utility of early diastolic mitral annular velocity (E") using tissue Doppler echocardiography.
- To differentiate constrictive pericarditis from primary restrictive cardiomyopathy and cardiac amyloidosis.
- To establish a specific E" cut-off value for diagnosing constrictive pericarditis.
Main Methods:
- Seventy-five patients were studied: 23 with constrictive pericarditis, 38 with cardiac amyloidosis, and 14 with primary restrictive cardiomyopathy.
- Standard mitral inflow characteristics were measured.
- Tissue Doppler echocardiography was employed to measure E" at the septal annulus.
Main Results:
- E" velocity was significantly higher in constrictive pericarditis patients (12.3 cm/s) compared to restrictive cardiomyopathy (5.1 cm/s) and cardiac amyloidosis patients.
- An E" cut-off value of >=8 cm/s demonstrated 95% sensitivity and 96% specificity for constrictive pericarditis.
- E" values showed no overlap between constrictive pericarditis and cardiac amyloidosis, and were lower in cardiac amyloidosis than primary restrictive cardiomyopathy.
Conclusions:
- Early diastolic mitral annular velocity (E") is a valuable parameter for distinguishing constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathies.
- A specific E" cut-off value can reliably diagnose constrictive pericarditis in patients with diastolic heart failure.
- Tissue Doppler echocardiography provides a non-invasive method to differentiate these cardiac conditions.
Abstract:
This study evaluated the diagnostic role of early diastolic mitral annular velocity (E') by tissue Doppler echocardiography for differentiating constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy (primary restrictive cardiomyopathy and cardiac amyloidosis). The study group consisted of 75 patients (53 men, 22 women; mean age 62 years, range 27 to 87). Of these, 23 patients had surgically confirmed constrictive pericarditis, 38 had biopsy-proved systemic amyloidosis and typical echocardiographic features of cardiac involvement, and 14 had primary restrictive cardiomyopathy. Standard mitral inflow characteristics were measured. Tissue Doppler echocardiography was used to measure E' at the septal annulus. E' was significantly higher in patients with constrictive pericarditis than in those with primary restrictive cardiomyopathy or cardiac amyloidosis (12.3 vs 5.1 cm/second, p <0.001). An E' cut-off value > or =8 cm/second resulted in 95% sensitivity and 96% specificity for the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis. There was no overlap of E' between patients who had constrictive pericarditis and those who had cardiac amyloidosis. In a subgroup analysis of restrictive cardiomyopathy, E' of patients who had cardiac amyloidosis was significantly lower than that of patients who had primary restrictive cardiomyopathy (4.6 vs 6.3 cm/second, p <0.001). Thus, E' velocity can distinguish between constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy with a specific cut-off value in patients with clinical and echocardiographic evidence of diastolic heart failure.
More Related Videos
08:09Echocardiographic Assessment of Cardiac Anatomy and Function in Adult Rats
Published on: December 13, 2019
11:50High-frequency High-resolution Echocardiography: First Evidence on Non-invasive Repeated Measure of Myocardial Strain, Contractility, and Mitral Regurgitation in the Ischemia-reperfused Murine Heart
Published on: July 9, 2010
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy