Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Design of Cecal Ligation and Puncture and Intranasal Infection Dual Model of Sepsis-Induced Immunosuppression
Published on: June 15, 2019
An update on the pathophysiology of sepsis
1Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Stellenbosch. pleroux@intekom.co.za
Abstract:
Mortality among critically ill patients has been attributed to the development of sepsis. About 28% of patients with sepsis still die, despite numerous interventions. Trials on sepsis investigated mostly anti-inflammatory strategies, based on the prevailing theory that sepsis represents an uncontrolled inflammatory response. None of these showed convincing benefit in humans, despite promising results in animal studies. The reason for this is becoming clear: sepsis represents a biphasic response to infection, and the initial pro-inflammatory response that we have targeted thus far is invariably followed by a prolonged period of immune suppression. In addition, a patient may oscillate between a pro- and anti-inflammatory state repeatedly. A single magic bullet therapy is thus unlikely to work. The mediators of this process are the cytokines, and a lot of research is focussed on modulating these to achieve a better outcome. In addition, the central role of the coagulation cascade in mediating inflammation and sepsis is becoming clear, and therapies addressing this mechanism are promising.
Insights
Sepsis mortality persists despite interventions. Understanding sepsis as a biphasic immune response, involving both inflammation and suppression, is key to developing effective treatments targeting cytokines and coagulation.
Area of Science:
- Critical care medicine
- Immunology
- Pathophysiology
Background:
- Sepsis remains a leading cause of mortality in critically ill patients, with a significant death rate despite current interventions.
- Previous therapeutic strategies primarily focused on anti-inflammatory approaches, largely failing to demonstrate efficacy in human trials.
- The complexity of sepsis, characterized by a biphasic immune response including inflammation and subsequent immune suppression, challenges single-target therapies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To elucidate the complex pathophysiology of sepsis beyond a simple inflammatory response.
- To highlight the limitations of solely targeting pro-inflammatory mechanisms in sepsis treatment.
- To emphasize the potential of novel therapeutic avenues by considering the biphasic nature of sepsis and its mediators.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on sepsis pathophysiology and therapeutic interventions.
- Analysis of the role of cytokines and the coagulation cascade in sepsis.
- Evaluation of the reasons for the failure of anti-inflammatory strategies in human sepsis trials.
Main Results:
- Sepsis involves a dynamic, biphasic immune response, not just uncontrolled inflammation.
- A subsequent period of immune suppression follows the initial pro-inflammatory phase.
- Patients may experience repeated oscillations between pro- and anti-inflammatory states.
Conclusions:
- A single therapeutic agent is unlikely to be effective against sepsis due to its complex, biphasic nature.
- Modulating cytokines and targeting the coagulation cascade represent promising therapeutic strategies for sepsis.
- A comprehensive understanding of sepsis pathophysiology is essential for developing successful treatments.
Related Concept Videos
Pneumonia II: Pathophysiology
Acute Kidney Injury II: Pathophysiology
Determinants of Bacterial Pathogenicity and Virulence
Acute Inflammation III: Local and Systemic Effects
Bacterial Meningitis II: Pathophysiology
Pulmonary Edema II: Pathophysiology

