Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 23, 2026

Ammonia Fiber Expansion (AFEX) Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Biomass
Published on: April 18, 2020
Compatibility of column inlet and adsorbent designs for processing of corn endosperm extract by expanded bed
Todd J Menkhaus1, Charles E Glatz
1Department of Chemical Engineering, 2114 Sweeney Hall, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011-2230, USA.
Abstract:
Corn has emerged as a viable host for expression of recombinant proteins; targeted expression to the endosperm has received particular attention. The protein extracts from corn endosperm differ from those of traditional hosts in regard to the nature of residual solids and extracted matrix contaminants. Each of these differences presents reasons for considering expanded bed adsorption for product capture and new considerations for limitations of the method. In this work three inlet-flow distribution devices (mesh, glass ballotini, and localized mixing) and six adsorbents with different physical (size and density), chemical (ligand), and base matrix properties were evaluated to determine conditions compatible with processing of crude corn endosperm extract by expanded bed adsorption. Of the inlet devices evaluated, the design with localized mixing at the inlet (as produced commercially by UpFront Chromatography A/S, Copenhagen, DK) allowed solids up to 550 microm into the column without clogging for all flow rates evaluated. A mesh at the inlet with size restriction of either 50 microm or 80 microm became clogged with very small corn particles (< 44 microm). When glass ballotini was used, large particles (550 microm) passed through for high flow rates (570 cm/h), but even small (< 44 microm) particles became trapped at a lower flow rate (180 cm/h). The physical and chemical properties of the resin determined whether solids could be eluted. The denser UpFront adsorbents allowed for complete elution of larger and more concentrated corn solids than the currently available Amersham Streamline adsorbents (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ) as a result of the former's higher flow rate for the desired 2x expansion (570 cm/h for UpFront vs. 180 cm/h for Streamline). All corn solids < 162 microm eluted through nonderivatized UpFront resin. Larger corn solids began to accumulate due to their elevated sedimentation velocities. Feeds of < 44 microm solids at 0.45% and 2.0% dry weight successfully eluted through ion exchange adsorbents (DEAE and SP) from UpFront. However, significant accumulation occurred when the solids size increased to a feed of < 96 microm solids, thus indicating a weak interaction between corn solids and both forms of ion exchange ligands. Expanded beds operated with Streamline ion exchange adsorbents (DEAE and SP) did not allow full elution of corn solids of < 44 microm. A hyperdiffuse style EBA resin produced by Biosepra (Ciphergen Biosystems, Fremont, CA) with CM functionality showed a severe interaction with corn solids that collapsed the expanded bed and could not be eliminated with elevated flow rates or higher salt concentration.
Related Concept Videos
Types Of Column Chromatography
Gel Filtration Chromatography
When the...
Principles Of Column Chromatography
Ion Exchange
Gas Chromatography: Types of Columns and Stationary Phases
For an analyte to remain on the column for a sufficient amount of time, it must exhibit some level of compatibility (or...
Analyte Adsorption and Distribution
Chromatography: Introduction
The phase in which the compounds linger or on which the compounds adsorb is called the stationary phase, whereas the mobile phase is the solvent that carries the solutes to be analyzed. In traditional column chromatography, the mixture flows through the stationary phase, and the compounds partition between the stationary and mobile phases...

