Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

AAPL and sociopolitical policy.

Roy J O'Shaughnessy1

  • 1Youth Forensic Services, Province of British Columbia, Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. royjoshaughnessy@telus.net

The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
|July 30, 2004
PubMed
Summary

The American Association of Psychiatrists in Law (AAPL) is debating its stance on the death penalty. Internal discussions are needed to determine if a policy on capital punishment aligns with the organization's values and goals.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Commentary: sex offenders and insanity.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2007
Same author

AAPL Practice Guideline for the Forensic Psychiatric Evaluation of Competence to Stand Trial: a Canadian legal perspective.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2007
Same author

Violent adolescents: psychiatry, philosophy, and politics.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2004
Same author

Violent adolescent sexual offenders.

Child and adolescent psychiatric clinics of North America·2002
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Forensic Psychiatry
  • Sociopolitical Issues

Background:

  • Medical organizations in Western nations often issue position statements on sociopolitical issues.
  • The American Psychiatric Association and American Medical Association have addressed capital punishment.
  • The American Association of Psychiatrists in Law (AAPL) previously endorsed a moratorium on capital punishment in 2001.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the internal debate within AAPL regarding a potential policy to abolish the death penalty.
  • To address the complexities arising from the lack of a defined policy-development process within AAPL.
  • To guide AAPL in shaping its position on capital punishment.

Main Methods:

  • The study poses three critical questions to facilitate AAPL's policy debate.
Keywords:
American Academy of Psychiatry and the LawDeath and EuthanasiaWar and Human Rights Abuses

Related Experiment Videos

  • Question 1: Assesses AAPL's potential contribution to the discourse on capital punishment.
  • Question 2: Examines the alignment of a potential stance with AAPL's core values.
  • Question 3: Evaluates the potential impact of a policy position on the organization's goals and mandate.

    • Main Results:

    • Recent calls for AAPL to endorse abolishing the death penalty have sparked diverse opinions.
    • The absence of a clear policy-development process complicates internal discussions.
    • The organization faces a need to define its role and potential contributions to the capital punishment debate.

    Conclusions:

    • AAPL must establish a clear process for policy development to navigate internal debates effectively.
    • A thorough evaluation is required to determine if a stance on capital punishment is consistent with AAPL's values.
    • The organization needs to consider how adopting a position on the death penalty would affect its overall mission and objectives.