Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Spatial memory and perspective taking.

Amy L Shelton1, Timothy P McNamara

  • 1Department of Psychology and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA. ashelton@jhu.edu

Memory & Cognition
|August 3, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mental Representations of Impossible Non-Euclidean Environments.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Collaborative Navigation Improves Spatial Learning Across Symmetric and Asymmetric Locomotion in Virtual Reality.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026
Same author

Processing spatial cue conflict in navigation: Distance estimation.

Cognitive psychology·2025
Same author

Local spatial navigation or "steering" in patients with vestibular loss in a virtual reality environment.

Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation·2023
Same author

Statistically Optimal Cue Integration During Human Spatial Navigation.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2023
Same author

The influence of environmental geometry and spatial symmetry on spatial updating during locomotion.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2022
Same journal

Limited protective effects of multilingualism against age-related cognitive decline.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Validation of illustrated texts: Can pictures raise awareness of inconsistencies?

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

4I remember (and forget) your happy smiling face: Directed forgetting of emotionally expressive faces of in-group and out-group members.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Identity in the spotlight: Matching faces without overlapping features.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Test delay and change awareness moderate retroactive and proactive memory effects.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

The Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) illusion in short-term memory: Opposite effects of retention interval on true and false recognition.

Memory & cognition·2026
See all related articles

Describing environments from familiar viewpoints improves spatial memory recall compared to novel ones. This suggests distinct mental representations support different spatial memory tasks.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Spatial Cognition
  • Human Memory

Background:

  • Understanding spatial environments often necessitates adopting different viewpoints.
  • Spatial perspective-taking is crucial for navigation and communication.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how describing familiar versus novel perspectives impacts subsequent spatial memory.
  • To explore the relationship between perspective-taking, memory recall, and task demands.

Main Methods:

  • A spatial perspective-taking task was designed where one participant described an object display.
  • Descriptions were made from perspectives varying from 0 to 180 degrees relative to the viewing perspective.
  • Memory was assessed using relative direction judgments, scene recognition, and map drawing.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Participants demonstrated faster and/or more accurate memory recall for familiar views compared to novel views.
  • Different memory tasks exhibited varying degrees of facilitation for visually perceived and described views.
  • Findings suggest the existence of multiple spatial memory representations.

Conclusions:

  • Familiar spatial perspectives enhance memory performance.
  • Spatial memory is not monolithic; different tasks rely on distinct representational systems.
  • The study highlights the importance of considering perspective and task specificity in spatial memory research.