Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

13.7K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
13.7K
Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

6.2K
Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
6.2K
Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

517
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
517
Measures of Intelligence01:29

Measures of Intelligence

8.2K
Psychologists measure intelligence by using standardized tests that produce a score known as the intelligence quotient or IQ. To understand IQ tests, it's important to recognize the key principles behind their construction: validity, reliability, and standardization.
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
8.2K
Wechsler's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence01:23

Wechsler's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence

1.9K
David Wechsler, a psychologist who worked with World War I veterans, developed a significant IQ test in 1939 called the Wechsler-Bellevue Intelligence Scale. This test was innovative because it combined several subtests that measured both verbal and nonverbal skills, reflecting Wechsler's belief that intelligence is a global capacity involving purposeful action, rational thinking, and effective interaction with the environment. This test later evolved into the Wechsler Adult Intelligence...
1.9K
Complementation Tests00:49

Complementation Tests

6.0K
A complementation test is a simple cross to identify whether the two mutations are located on the same gene or different genes. It was first performed by Edward Lewis in the 1940s while working on fruit flies. He developed the test to identify the location and arrangement of different mutations on chromosomes.
Organisms heterozygous for different mutations are crossed pairwise in all combinations. If present on different genes, the mutations can complement each other by providing the missing...
6.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in aerosol and surface samples in high acuity hospital settings during community epidemic waves - implications for risk-based infection control.

Respiratory medicine·2026
Same author

Impact of Number of Passes Before Rescue Therapy in Thrombectomy for Basilar Artery Strokes.

Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)·2026
Same author

Declining Performance on American Board of Emergency Medicine Written Examinations.

AEM education and training·2025
Same author

Association between American Board of Emergency Medicine certification performance and severe state medical licensure actions.

The American journal of emergency medicine·2025
Same author

Endovascular treatment versus medical management for basilar artery occlusion with low-to-moderate symptoms (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale < 10).

European stroke journal·2024
Same author

Emergency Medicine Milestones Final Ratings Are Often Subpar.

The western journal of emergency medicine·2024

Related Experiment Videos

Quantitative validation of a general competency composite assessment evaluation.

Earl J Reisdorff1, Dale J Carlson, Mat Reeves

  • 1Michigan State University Emergency Medicine Residency Lansing, Lansing, MI 48910, USA. reisdoe@irmcmail.irmc.org

Academic Emergency Medicine : Official Journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
|August 4, 2004
PubMed
Summary

This study refined evaluation methods to effectively measure resident competency acquisition. Principal component analysis confirmed the validity of assessment items for the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education general competencies.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Psychometrics
  • Competency Assessment

Background:

  • The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) general competencies (GCs) are crucial for evaluating resident physicians.
  • Existing evaluation processes require modification and validation to accurately assess resident acquisition of these GCs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To modify and validate a composite assessment evaluation process for ACGME GCs.
  • To enhance the psychometric validity of resident evaluation tools.

Main Methods:

  • A multicenter study involving 150 emergency medicine resident evaluations was analyzed.
  • Principal component analysis (PCA) was employed to assess psychometric validity and identify key components of the evaluation items.
  • Factor loadings were measured to determine the variability explained by principal components.

Main Results:

  • PCA indicated significant variability explained by the first three principal components for all GCs, ranging from 55% for professionalism to 83% for patient care.
  • Medical knowledge assessments appeared to capture a single factor, while professionalism assessments indicated a multidimensional construct.
  • Evaluation items demonstrated psychometric validity for assessing resident acquisition of GCs.

Conclusions:

  • A structured development process successfully created valid evaluation items for ACGME GCs.
  • The modified assessment process enhances the ability to measure resident competency acquisition accurately.