Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Approximating selective sweeps.

Richard Durrett1, Jason Schweinsberg

  • 1Department of Mathematics, Cornell University, 523 Malott Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA. rtd1@cornell.edu

Theoretical Population Biology
|August 11, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Estimating the Growth Rate of a Birth and Death Process Using data From a Small Sample.

Bulletin of mathematical biology·2026
Same author

cloneRate: fast estimation of single-cell clonal dynamics using coalescent theory.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2023
Same author

Selective sweeps in SARS-CoV-2 variant competition.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2022
Same author

Spatial evolutionary games with weak selection.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2017
Same author

Spatial Moran Models I. Stochastic Tunneling in the Neutral Case.

The annals of applied probability : an official journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics·2015
Same author

Fingering in Stochastic Growth Models.

Experimental mathematics·2015
Same journal

Applying invasion criterion to cultural evolution.

Theoretical population biology·2026
Same journal

The joint spectrum over trees under the Kingman coalescent with varying population.

Theoretical population biology·2026
Same journal

Statistical test to compare the linkage model and the admixture model based on central limit results.

Theoretical population biology·2026
Same journal

Threshold dynamics in age-structured distributions with expanding support: A unified mathematical framework.

Theoretical population biology·2026
Same journal

Mechanistic-statistical model for the expansion of ash dieback.

Theoretical population biology·2026
Same journal

Dynamics of an intraguild predation system with optimal foraging and harvesting.

Theoretical population biology·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Selective sweeps reduce DNA variation near beneficial mutations. A new stick-breaking model accurately approximates this process, improving upon simplified logistic models, especially when beneficial alleles are rare.

Area of Science:

  • Population genetics
  • Molecular evolution
  • Computational biology

Background:

  • Advantageous mutations reduce DNA sequence variation near the mutation site.
  • Previous models, like Kaplan et al. (1989), used complex simulations.
  • Many studies simplified selective sweep modeling using logistic differential equations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a new model for selective sweeps.
  • To assess the accuracy of the logistic differential equation approximation.
  • To understand the impact of randomness on selective sweep dynamics.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a random partition model based on a stick-breaking process.
  • Conducted simulations to compare the new model with existing approaches.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzed the effect of the number of individuals with the advantageous allele.

    • Main Results:

    • The stick-breaking process accurately approximates the impact of selective sweeps.
    • Simplified logistic models can lead to significant errors when the number of beneficial alleles is small.
    • Randomness is crucial for accurate modeling, particularly in early stages of sweeps.

    Conclusions:

    • The stick-breaking random partition model offers a more accurate representation of selective sweeps.
    • Ignoring randomness in simplified models can lead to substantial inaccuracies.
    • This improved modeling is vital for understanding genetic variation dynamics during selection.