Interventions fail to increase cancer screening rates in community-based primary care practices
Related Experiment Videos
Mack T Ruffin1, Daniel W Gorenflo
1Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0708, USA. mruffin@umich.edu
Background:
Cancer screening in primary care offices is reaching only a modest percentage of adults 50 years and older. The objectives of this study were to determine if screening rates for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer could be significantly increased by two simple office interventions in community-based primary care offices and then maintained over 3 years.
Methods:
Twenty-two community-based primary care practices were divided randomly into four arms: control, practice-based intervention, patient-based intervention, and both interventions combined. At baseline and annually for 3 years, medical records from approximately 100 male and 100 female patients 50 years and older were randomly selected. The outcome measures were screening rates for mammogram, Pap smear, fecal occult blood test, and flexible sigmoidoscopy or other colonic imaging.
Results:
Generally each study arm evidenced a significant 1-year increase in screening rates, followed by an overall decline to approximate baseline levels. The first year increases in screening were not related to either invention, alone or in combination.
Conclusions:
These interventions do not have a significant impact on cancer screening rates in adults over several years. A variety of possible variables may have affected the long-term outcomes.
Insights
Simple office interventions did not significantly increase cancer screening rates in adults over 50. Screening rates initially rose but returned to baseline levels within three years.
Area of Science:
- Primary Care Medicine
- Preventive Oncology
- Public Health
Background:
- Cancer screening rates among adults aged 50+ in primary care settings remain suboptimal.
- Effective strategies are needed to improve uptake of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screenings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of two office-based interventions on cancer screening rates in primary care.
- To determine if these interventions could significantly increase and sustain screening rates over three years.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial involving 22 primary care practices across four arms: control, practice-based intervention, patient-based intervention, and a combination.
- Annual medical record review of approximately 200 patients (50+ years old) per practice over three years.
- Outcome measures included screening rates for mammography, Pap smears, fecal occult blood tests, and colon imaging.
Main Results:
- All study arms showed a significant increase in screening rates at the one-year mark.
- However, screening rates declined across all arms, returning to near baseline levels by year three.
- The initial one-year increases were not attributable to either intervention, individually or combined.
Conclusions:
- The implemented office-based interventions failed to produce a significant long-term impact on cancer screening rates.
- Further research is needed to identify variables influencing sustained cancer screening adherence in primary care settings.
Related Concept Videos
Preventive Healthcare Services
Nursing Interventions I: Taxonomy of Nursing Interventions
A nursing intervention is a treatment or action based on scientific concepts and knowledge from the nursing, behavioral, and physical sciences. Identifying and prioritizing nursing interventions based on the desired outcome is...
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Cancer Vaccines
Cancer vaccines come in two categories: preventive (prophylactic) and treatment (active). Preventive vaccines, such as the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, protect against viruses that cause certain...