Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The two-point discrimination test--time for a re-appraisal?

G Lundborg1, B Rosén

  • 1Department of Hand Surgery, Malmö University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden. goran.lundborg@hand.mas.lu.se

Journal of Hand Surgery (Edinburgh, Scotland)
|September 1, 2004
PubMed
Summary

The two-point discrimination (2PD) test, crucial for nerve repair outcomes, shows high variability due to non-standardized techniques. Its use as the sole measure of tactile sensation recovery needs reevaluation.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Genome Wide Conditional Mouse Knockout Resources.

Drug discovery today. Disease models·2024
Same author

The East Africa Consortium for human papillomavirus and cervical cancer in women living with HIV/AIDS.

Annals of medicine·2022
Same author

Early production of table olives at a mid-7th millennium BP submerged site off the Carmel coast (Israel).

Scientific reports·2021
Same author

Hand strength and dexterity in individuals with hand eczema.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2020
Same author

MeCP2-regulated miRNAs control early human neurogenesis through differential effects on ERK and AKT signaling.

Molecular psychiatry·2017
Same author

Corrigendum to "The sooner the better: Genetic testing following ovarian cancer diagnosis" [Gynecol. Oncol. 137 (2015) 423-429].

Gynecologic oncology·2017

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Sensory Testing

Background:

  • The two-point discrimination (2PD) test is widely used to evaluate sensory recovery after nerve repair.
  • Significant variability exists in reported 2PD results, questioning its reliability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate factors contributing to the wide variability in 2PD test outcomes after nerve repair.
  • To critically assess the standardization and application of the 2PD test in clinical practice.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of factors influencing 2PD test results.
  • Review of current testing protocols and their standardization.

Main Results:

  • The 2PD testing technique lacks standardization, leading to implausible variability in reported sensory outcomes.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Inconsistent application of the 2PD test hinders accurate assessment of tactile gnosis recovery.

    • Conclusions:

    • The current lack of standardization in 2PD testing significantly impacts the reliability of sensory outcome assessments post-nerve repair.
    • The 2PD test should not be used as the sole measure for evaluating tactile gnosis recovery; detailed reporting of methodology is essential.