Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Mobile arm supports: an evaluation.

R Haworth, S Dunscombe, P J Nichols

    Rheumatology and Rehabilitation
    |November 1, 1978
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    A follow-up survey found that 47% of patients fitted with mobile arm supports were still using them. The study discusses reasons for non-use and the need for readjustments in assistive devices.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    NWChem: Past, present, and future.

    The Journal of chemical physics·2020
    Same author

    Ultrastructural and behavioural changes precede amyloid deposition in a transgenic model of Alzheimer's disease.

    Neuroscience·2003
    Same author

    Ovarian teratoma in a common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).

    The Veterinary record·2003
    Same author

    An efficient synthesis of the taxane-derived anticancer agent ABT-271.

    The Journal of organic chemistry·2001
    Same author

    Synthesis of the C-13 side chain precursors of the 9-dihydrotaxane analogue ABT-271.

    Organic letters·2000
    Same author

    The PCR assay in the preclinical safety evaluation of nucleic acid medicines.

    Human & experimental toxicology·2000
    Same journal

    Parenteral iron therapy in the anaemia of rheumatoid arthritis.

    Rheumatology and rehabilitation·1982
    Same journal

    Diclofenac sodium, diflunisal and naproxen: patient preferences for anti-inflammatory drugs in rheumatoid arthritis.

    Rheumatology and rehabilitation·1982
    Same journal

    Polymyalgia rheumatica in a defined elderly community.

    Rheumatology and rehabilitation·1982
    Same journal

    The recovery of the severely disable stroke patient.

    Rheumatology and rehabilitation·1982
    Same journal

    Multisystem presentation of eosinophilic fasciitis.

    Rheumatology and rehabilitation·1982
    Same journal

    Group G streptococcal arthritis.

    Rheumatology and rehabilitation·1982
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Rehabilitation Engineering
    • Assistive Technology
    • Patient Outcomes

    Background:

    • Mobile arm supports are assistive devices designed to aid individuals with mobility impairments.
    • Long-term usability and patient satisfaction with assistive devices are critical factors in their effectiveness.
    • Understanding usage patterns and reasons for discontinuation is essential for improving assistive technology provision.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the long-term use of mobile arm supports (MAS) among patients.
    • To identify factors influencing the continued use or discontinuation of MAS.
    • To explore the implications of device readjustment needs on patient adherence.

    Main Methods:

    • A follow-up survey was conducted with 124 patients fitted with MAS between 1970 and 1976.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Data collection focused on duration of use, current usage status, and reasons for non-use.
  • Analysis included assessing the proportion of patients using MAS beyond one year and those still using them at the time of contact.
  • Main Results:

    • 33% of patients fitted with MAS were known to have used them for over one year.
    • 47% of contacted patients reported ongoing use of their MAS.
    • Reasons for non-use and the necessity for device readjustments were identified as key discussion points.

    Conclusions:

    • Mobile arm supports demonstrate a significant potential for long-term utility in specific patient populations.
    • Addressing patient needs for device readjustment is crucial for sustained use and satisfaction.
    • Further research into factors influencing adherence can optimize the prescription and management of assistive technologies.