Related Experiment Videos
Female age in ART: when to stop?
1Division of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Perinatology and Gynecology, University Medical Centre, Huispostnummer F 05.126, Heidelberglaan 100, NL-3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands. F.Broekmans@azu.nl
Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation
|September 14, 2004
Summary
Assisted reproduction technology (ART) success rates decline with age, increasing costs. Identifying favorable predictive factors like antral follicle count can help optimize ART for women over 40.
Area of Science:
- Reproductive Medicine
- Infertility Treatment
- Geriatric Gynecology
Background:
- Assisted reproduction technology (ART) success rates significantly decrease with advancing maternal age.
- The increasing costs per live birth in ART necessitate a discussion on age-related treatment limits.
- Current ART eligibility often relies solely on female age, potentially excluding suitable candidates.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the age-related efficacy and cost-effectiveness of ART treatments.
- To explore the potential for establishing age limits in ART applications.
- To identify predictive factors that could refine patient selection for ART.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of existing ART success rates and cost-benefit analyses.
- Analysis of ongoing research data on pregnancy outcomes across different age groups.
- Investigation of predictive markers for ART success, such as antral follicle count.
Main Results:
- ART costs per child born increase substantially after age 40 for both intrauterine insemination and in vitro fertilization.
- Pregnancy prognosis approaches zero for women aged 44 and above.
- Antral follicle count can identify women over 40 with favorable ART prospects.
Conclusions:
- Age limits for ART should be considered, balancing treatment costs and success probabilities.
- Predictive factors like antral follicle count can personalize ART eligibility, potentially reducing costs and improving access for selected older women.
- Individualized assessment using predictive markers may offer a more equitable approach than strict age-based exclusions in ART.